From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: add bounds checking when updating ctime
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 13:35:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230919-ctime-v1-1-97b3da92f504@kernel.org> (raw)
During some discussion around another patch, Linus pointed out that
we don't want to skip updating the ctime unless the current coarse
time is in a reasonable range.
When updating the ctime on a multigrain filesystem, only keep the
current ctime if the coarse time is less than 2 jiffies earlier.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
While we're still discussing whether to keep this series in, here's the
fix for the issue that Linus identified yesterday, basically that a
large clock jump backward could result in the m/ctime not being updated
properly.
---
fs/inode.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 54237f4242ff..f3d68e4b8df7 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -2571,6 +2571,13 @@ struct timespec64 current_time(struct inode *inode)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(current_time);
+/*
+ * Coarse timer ticks happen (roughly) every jiffy. If we see a coarse time
+ * more than 2 jiffies earlier than the current ctime, then we need to
+ * update it. This is the max delta allowed (in ns).
+ */
+#define COARSE_TIME_MAX_DELTA (2 / HZ * NSEC_PER_SEC)
+
/**
* inode_set_ctime_current - set the ctime to current_time
* @inode: inode
@@ -2599,8 +2606,19 @@ struct timespec64 inode_set_ctime_current(struct inode *inode)
* existing ctime. Just keep the existing value if so.
*/
ctime.tv_sec = inode->__i_ctime.tv_sec;
- if (timespec64_compare(&ctime, &now) > 0)
- return ctime;
+ if (timespec64_compare(&ctime, &now) > 0) {
+ struct timespec64 limit = now;
+
+ /*
+ * If the current coarse-grained clock is earlier than
+ * it should be, then that's an indication that there
+ * may have been a backward clock jump, and that the
+ * update should not be skipped.
+ */
+ timespec64_add_ns(&limit, COARSE_TIME_MAX_DELTA);
+ if (timespec64_compare(&ctime, &limit) < 0)
+ return ctime;
+ }
/*
* Ctime updates are usually protected by the inode_lock, but
---
base-commit: 0b4cbb6924ecf459c12b2b5ff4370ae29a276fee
change-id: 20230919-ctime-14ad041893fb
Best regards,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-19 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 17:35 Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-09-20 8:49 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230919-ctime-v1-1-97b3da92f504@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®