From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap shared-only memslots when private attribute changes
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 13:33:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230921203331.3746712-9-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230921203331.3746712-1-seanjc@google.com>
Zap all relevant memslots, including shared-only memslots, if the private
memory attribute is being changed. If userspace converts a range to
private, KVM must zap shared SPTEs to prevent the guest from accessing
the memory as shared. If userspace converts a range to shared, zapping
SPTEs for shared-only memslots isn't strictly necessary, but doing so
ensures that KVM will install a hugepage mapping if possible, e.g. if a
2MiB range that was mixed is converted to be 100% shared.
Fixes: dcde045383f3 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Handle page fault for private memory")
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 148931cf9dba..aa67d9d6fcf8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -7259,10 +7259,17 @@ bool kvm_arch_pre_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
{
/*
- * KVM x86 currently only supports KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE, skip
- * the slot if the slot will never consume the PRIVATE attribute.
+ * Zap SPTEs even if the slot can't be mapped PRIVATE. KVM x86 only
+ * supports KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE, and so it *seems* like KVM
+ * can simply ignore such slots. But if userspace is making memory
+ * PRIVATE, then KVM must prevent the guest from accessing the memory
+ * as shared. And if userspace is making memory SHARED and this point
+ * is reached, then at least one page within the range was previously
+ * PRIVATE, i.e. the slot's possible hugepage ranges are changing.
+ * Zapping SPTEs in this case ensures KVM will reassess whether or not
+ * a hugepage can be used for affected ranges.
*/
- if (!kvm_slot_can_be_private(range->slot))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm_arch_has_private_mem(kvm)))
return false;
return kvm_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, range);
--
2.42.0.515.g380fc7ccd1-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-21 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-21 20:33 [PATCH 00/13] KVM: guest_memfd fixes Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 01/13] KVM: Assert that mmu_invalidate_in_progress *never* goes negative Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 02/13] KVM: Actually truncate the inode when doing PUNCH_HOLE for guest_memfd Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 03/13] KVM: WARN if *any* MMU invalidation sequence doesn't add a range Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 04/13] KVM: WARN if there are danging MMU invalidations at VM destruction Sean Christopherson
2023-09-27 3:16 ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-28 18:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 05/13] KVM: Fix MMU invalidation bookkeeping in guest_memfd Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 06/13] KVM: Disallow hugepages for incompatible gmem bindings, but let 'em succeed Sean Christopherson
2023-09-22 22:42 ` Michael Roth
2023-09-28 18:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-02 15:53 ` Michael Roth
2023-10-02 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 07/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Track PRIVATE impact on hugepage mappings for all memslots Sean Christopherson
2023-09-27 6:01 ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-27 14:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 09/13] KVM: Always add relevant ranges to invalidation set when changing attributes Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 10/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop repeated add() of to-be-invalidated range Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 11/13] KVM: selftests: Refactor private mem conversions to prep for punch_hole test Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 12/13] KVM: selftests: Add a "pure" PUNCH_HOLE on guest_memfd testcase Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21 20:33 ` [PATCH 13/13] KVM: Rename guest_mem.c to guest_memfd.c Sean Christopherson
2023-09-29 2:22 ` [PATCH 00/13] KVM: guest_memfd fixes Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230921203331.3746712-9-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®