From: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
To: jmaloy@redhat.com, ying.xue@windriver.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tipc: fix a potential deadlock on &tx->lock
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 18:14:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230927181414.59928-1-dg573847474@gmail.com> (raw)
It seems that tipc_crypto_key_revoke() could be be invoked by
wokequeue tipc_crypto_work_rx() under process context and
timer/rx callback under softirq context, thus the lock acquisition
on &tx->lock seems better use spin_lock_bh() to prevent possible
deadlock.
This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
developing for irq-related deadlock.
tipc_crypto_work_rx() <workqueue>
--> tipc_crypto_key_distr()
--> tipc_bcast_xmit()
--> tipc_bcbase_xmit()
--> tipc_bearer_bc_xmit()
--> tipc_crypto_xmit()
--> tipc_ehdr_build()
--> tipc_crypto_key_revoke()
--> spin_lock(&tx->lock)
<timer interrupt>
--> tipc_disc_timeout()
--> tipc_bearer_xmit_skb()
--> tipc_crypto_xmit()
--> tipc_ehdr_build()
--> tipc_crypto_key_revoke()
--> spin_lock(&tx->lock) <deadlock here>
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
---
net/tipc/crypto.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c
index 302fd749c424..43c3f1c971b8 100644
--- a/net/tipc/crypto.c
+++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c
@@ -1441,14 +1441,14 @@ static int tipc_crypto_key_revoke(struct net *net, u8 tx_key)
struct tipc_crypto *tx = tipc_net(net)->crypto_tx;
struct tipc_key key;
- spin_lock(&tx->lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&tx->lock);
key = tx->key;
WARN_ON(!key.active || tx_key != key.active);
/* Free the active key */
tipc_crypto_key_set_state(tx, key.passive, 0, key.pending);
tipc_crypto_key_detach(tx->aead[key.active], &tx->lock);
- spin_unlock(&tx->lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&tx->lock);
pr_warn("%s: key is revoked\n", tx->name);
return -EKEYREVOKED;
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-27 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-27 18:14 Chengfeng Ye [this message]
2023-09-29 18:29 ` Jacob Keller
2023-10-01 17:46 ` Simon Horman
2023-10-02 20:30 ` Jon Maloy
2023-10-03 6:29 ` Chengfeng Ye
2023-10-04 20:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230927181414.59928-1-dg573847474@gmail.com \
--to=dg573847474@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®