From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: shave work on failed file open
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:25:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230928-kulleraugen-restaurant-dd14e2a9c0b0@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wibs_xBP2BGG4UHKhiP2B=7KJnx_LL18O0bGK8QkULLHg@mail.gmail.com>
> Which all seems to be the case already, so with the put_cred() not
> needing the RCU delay, I thing we really could do this patch (note:
So I spent a good chunk of time going through this patch.
Before file->f_cred was introduced file->f_{g,u}id would have been
accessible just under rcu protection. And file->f_cred->f_fs{g,u}id
replaced that access. So I think the intention was that file->f_cred
would function the same way, i.e., it would be possible to go from file
to cred under rcu without requiring a reference.
But basically, file->f_cred is the only field that would give this
guarantee. Other pointers such as file->f_security
(security_file_free()) don't and are freed outside of the rcu delay
already as well.
This patch means that if someone wants to access file->f_cred under rcu
they now need to call get_file_rcu() first.
Nothing has relied on this rcu-only file->f_cred quirk/feature until now
so I think it's fine to change it.
Does that make sense?
Please take a look at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git/commit/?h=vfs.misc&id=e3f15ee79197fc8b17d3496b6fa4fa0fc20f5406
for testing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-28 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-26 16:22 Mateusz Guzik
2023-09-26 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-26 19:28 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-09-27 14:09 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-27 14:34 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-09-27 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-27 17:56 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-09-27 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-27 18:32 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-09-27 20:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-27 21:06 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-09-27 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-27 21:30 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-09-28 13:25 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-09-28 14:05 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-28 14:43 ` Jann Horn
2023-09-28 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-29 9:20 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-29 13:31 ` Jann Horn
2023-09-29 19:57 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-29 21:23 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-09-29 21:39 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-09-29 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-30 9:04 ` Christian Brauner
2023-10-03 16:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-10-10 3:06 ` Al Viro
2023-10-10 8:29 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-29 22:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-29 23:02 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230928-kulleraugen-restaurant-dd14e2a9c0b0@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®