mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86/mmu: remove unnecessary "bool shared" argument from functions
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 12:29:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230928162959.1514661-2-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230928162959.1514661-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>

Neither tdp_mmu_next_root nor kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root need to know
if the lock is taken for read or write.  Either way, protection
is achieved via RCU and tdp_mmu_pages_lock.  Remove the argument
and just assert that the lock is taken.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c     |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h |  3 +--
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index f7901cb4d2fa..64b1bdba943e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3548,7 +3548,7 @@ static void mmu_free_root_page(struct kvm *kvm, hpa_t *root_hpa,
 		return;
 
 	if (is_tdp_mmu_page(sp))
-		kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(kvm, sp, false);
+		kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(kvm, sp);
 	else if (!--sp->root_count && sp->role.invalid)
 		kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, invalid_list);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 6cd4dd631a2f..ab0876015be7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -73,10 +73,13 @@ static void tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
 	tdp_mmu_free_sp(sp);
 }
 
-void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
-			  bool shared)
+void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root)
 {
-	kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(kvm, shared);
+	/*
+	 * Either read or write is okay, but the lock is needed because
+	 * writers might not take tdp_mmu_pages_lock.
+	 */
+	lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
 	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count))
 		return;
@@ -106,10 +109,16 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
  */
 static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
 					      struct kvm_mmu_page *prev_root,
-					      bool shared, bool only_valid)
+					      bool only_valid)
 {
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *next_root;
 
+	/*
+	 * While the roots themselves are RCU-protected, fields such as
+	 * role.invalid are protected by mmu_lock.
+	 */
+	lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	if (prev_root)
@@ -132,7 +141,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	if (prev_root)
-		kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(kvm, prev_root, shared);
+		kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(kvm, prev_root);
 
 	return next_root;
 }
@@ -144,13 +153,12 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
  * recent root. (Unless keeping a live reference is desirable.)
  *
  * If shared is set, this function is operating under the MMU lock in read
- * mode. In the unlikely event that this thread must free a root, the lock
- * will be temporarily dropped and reacquired in write mode.
+ * mode.
  */
 #define __for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(_kvm, _root, _as_id, _shared, _only_valid)\
-	for (_root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, NULL, _shared, _only_valid);	\
-	     _root;								\
-	     _root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, _root, _shared, _only_valid))	\
+	for (_root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, NULL, _only_valid);	\
+	     _root;							\
+	     _root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, _root, _only_valid))	\
 		if (kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(_kvm, _shared) &&		\
 		    kvm_mmu_page_as_id(_root) != _as_id) {			\
 		} else
@@ -159,9 +167,9 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
 	__for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(_kvm, _root, _as_id, _shared, true)
 
 #define for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(_kvm, _root, _shared)			\
-	for (_root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, NULL, _shared, false);		\
-	     _root;								\
-	     _root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, _root, _shared, false))		\
+	for (_root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, NULL, false);		\
+	     _root;							\
+	     _root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, _root, false))
 		if (!kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(_kvm, _shared)) {		\
 		} else
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
index 733a3aef3a96..20d97aa46c49 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
@@ -17,8 +17,7 @@ __must_check static inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(struct kvm_mmu_page *root)
 	return refcount_inc_not_zero(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count);
 }
 
-void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
-			  bool shared);
+void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root);
 
 bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool flush);
 bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
-- 
2.39.1



  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-28 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-28 16:29 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86/mmu: small locking cleanups Paolo Bonzini
2023-09-28 16:29 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2023-09-28 16:46   ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86/mmu: remove unnecessary "bool shared" argument from functions Maxim Levitsky
2023-09-29 16:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-28 16:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86/mmu: remove unnecessary "bool shared" argument from iterators Paolo Bonzini
2023-09-28 16:55   ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-09-29 16:14     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-28 16:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86/mmu: always take tdp_mmu_pages_lock Paolo Bonzini
2023-09-29  7:30   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-29 16:16     ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230928162959.1514661-2-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®