From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B7FE7C4D4 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 15:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233561AbjJDPcs (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2023 11:32:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47376 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233593AbjJDPcn (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2023 11:32:43 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96598C4 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 08:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE9EC15; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 422893F762; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 08:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:32:34 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Olivier Deprez Cc: Jens Wiklander , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Marc Bonnici , Sudeep Holla , Coboy Chen , Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Implement the notification bind and unbind interface Message-ID: <20231004153234.ktk6egntk7drao47@bogus> References: <20230929-ffa_v1-1_notif-v3-0-c8e4f15190c8@arm.com> <20230929-ffa_v1-1_notif-v3-3-c8e4f15190c8@arm.com> <20231004091154.GB1091193@rayden> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 10:50:26AM +0100, Olivier Deprez wrote: > Hi Jens, > > > dst_id and drv_info->vm_id should be swapped. > > I'm curious about this because swapping like this actually makes hafnium > fail. Need to check from the spec. I did check after I had swapped this in v2(because I was convinced Jens) was correct and you reported the failure. Reading the spec again the other day, I got corrected myself and agreed with Olivier and my original implementation(v1) which matches this patch(v3). -- Regards, Sudeep