mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Override implicit ordered attribute in workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask()
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:48:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231011024842.3348767-1-longman@redhat.com> (raw)

Commit 5c0338c68706 ("workqueue: restore WQ_UNBOUND/max_active==1
to be ordered") enabled implicit ordered attribute to be added to
WQ_UNBOUND workqueues with max_active of 1. This prevented the changing
of attributes to these workqueues leading to fix commit 0a94efb5acbb
("workqueue: implicit ordered attribute should be overridable").

However, workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask() was not updated at that time.
So sysfs changes to wq_unbound_cpumask has no effect on WQ_UNBOUND
workqueues with implicit ordered attribute. Since not all WQ_UNBOUND
workqueues are visible on sysfs, we are not able to make all the
necessary cpumask changes even if we iterates all the workqueue cpumasks
in sysfs and changing them one by one.

Fix this problem by applying the corresponding change made
to apply_workqueue_attrs_locked() in the fix commit to
workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask().

Fixes: 5c0338c68706 ("workqueue: restore WQ_UNBOUND/max_active==1 to be ordered")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index d141bd8eb2b7..19d403aa41b0 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5785,9 +5785,13 @@ static int workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(const cpumask_var_t unbound_cpumask)
 	list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
 		if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
 			continue;
+
 		/* creating multiple pwqs breaks ordering guarantee */
-		if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED)
-			continue;
+		if (!list_empty(&wq->pwqs)) {
+			if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT)
+				continue;
+			wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED;
+		}
 
 		ctx = apply_wqattrs_prepare(wq, wq->unbound_attrs, unbound_cpumask);
 		if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
-- 
2.39.3


             reply	other threads:[~2023-10-11  2:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-11  2:48 Waiman Long [this message]
2023-10-11 12:16 ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-10-11 14:42   ` Waiman Long
2023-10-12 19:52 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231011024842.3348767-1-longman@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®