From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BDACDB465 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234200AbjJPQ4g (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:56:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44324 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234346AbjJPQ4T (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:56:19 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3938B1BDA for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 09:52:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=+K+H6P5ca06ze5jNAi7+j/eV/kQqkOwYTk279J4BMsk=; b=VnvWKzb8GvEO+SpPOl7tcHqHxv 5e247SODqOQFoAo6il1rena7v99LKIrrYTa9mmHzDV57kak5eLwW/3SV5Du1wk4DRL9LvEHFhyfuD +OuckGbgM4tCDpf6Hvs8bzBm8Uc0yjP0kilNj71H4eT4+qgIlpoZe/5p3QQjLlus82xjxvuARfdc5 /rjKI87L/HNe7XjLbyj6Onp67mKmxkAh72cmM0hCTTK17jP4WO6XVkzHfLXUIw3i9ohTcCu+YPvTn fR8AIh6OgO+mtKYUnZc/SE0hocf9QU0syq52tlsClm3BRoWxoVWkqBXuxZOXC3eA0EDhmFh2nrbFv PR6TLIaw==; Received: from j130084.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.130.84] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qsQp6-007CyA-Nb; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:52:08 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 63969300513; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 18:52:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 18:52:08 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Youssef Esmat , LKML , bsegall@google.com, mingo@kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, qyousef@layalina.io, chris.hyser@oracle.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, pjt@google.com, pavel@ucw.cz, qperret@google.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, joshdon@google.com, timj@gnu.org, kprateek.nayak@amd.com, yu.c.chen@intel.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, efault@gmx.de, tglx@linutronix.de, wuyun.abel@bytedance.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/eevdf: Toggle eligibility through sched_feat Message-ID: <20231016165208.GH33217@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20231013030213.2472697-1-youssefesmat@chromium.org> <20231015104428.GA11840@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20231016112851.5cc0ccad@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231016112851.5cc0ccad@gandalf.local.home> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:28:51AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > The main point is, our testing is not around any single benchmark that we > are trying to make happy. We really are looking at what makes the user base > run better in the real world. This is a key (har-har) performance indicator for you guys though, I've seen it mentioned before (with the core-scheduling crud IIRC). As such it would be good to capture in a stand alone program and share.