mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
	adrian.hunter@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
	alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com, tinghao.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/7] perf/x86/intel: Support LBR event logging
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 20:18:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231019181827.GB35308@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c23fa9e8-1b37-4d44-a554-f8f0508968b0@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:26:01AM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:

> The original LBR event data is saved at offset 32 of LBR_INFO register.
> In get_lbr_events(), the data was simply copied to the offset 32 of
> cpuc->lbr_events.

Urgh, missed that. Clearly reading is a skill :-)

> 
> The intel_pmu_update_lbr_event() reorders the value and saves it
> starting from the offset 0.
> 
> I agree it's hard to read since it combines the src and dst into the
> same variable.
> 
> I will use the suggested code and also update the get_lbr_events().

Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-19 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-04 18:40 [PATCH V4 1/7] perf: Add branch stack counters kan.liang
2023-10-04 18:40 ` [PATCH V4 2/7] perf/x86: Add PERF_X86_EVENT_NEEDS_BRANCH_STACK flag kan.liang
2023-10-04 18:40 ` [PATCH V4 3/7] perf: Add branch_sample_call_stack kan.liang
2023-10-04 18:40 ` [PATCH V4 4/7] perf/x86/intel: Support LBR event logging kan.liang
2023-10-19  9:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-19 13:56     ` Liang, Kan
2023-10-19  9:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-19 13:58     ` Liang, Kan
2023-10-19 10:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-19 14:26     ` Liang, Kan
2023-10-19 18:18       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-10-19 11:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-19 14:28     ` Liang, Kan
2023-10-19 11:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-19 14:31     ` Liang, Kan
2023-10-19 11:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-20 12:45     ` Liang, Kan
2023-10-04 18:40 ` [PATCH V4 5/7] tools headers UAPI: Sync include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h header with the kernel kan.liang
2023-10-04 18:40 ` [PATCH V4 6/7] perf header: Support num and width of branch counters kan.liang
2023-10-04 18:40 ` [PATCH V4 7/7] perf tools: Add branch counter knob kan.liang
2023-10-16 17:48 ` [PATCH V4 1/7] perf: Add branch stack counters Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231019181827.GB35308@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=tinghao.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome