From: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
To: stefanha@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] virtio/vsock: Fix uninit-value in virtio_transport_recv_pkt()
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:01:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231026150154.3536433-1-syoshida@redhat.com> (raw)
KMSAN reported the following uninit-value access issue:
=====================================================
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1dfb/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1421
virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1dfb/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1421
vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
Uninit was stored to memory at:
virtio_transport_space_update net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1274 [inline]
virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1ee8/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1415
vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
Uninit was created at:
slab_post_alloc_hook+0x105/0xad0 mm/slab.h:767
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline]
kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5a2/0xaf0 mm/slub.c:3523
kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:559
__alloc_skb+0x2fd/0x770 net/core/skbuff.c:650
alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1286 [inline]
virtio_vsock_alloc_skb include/linux/virtio_vsock.h:66 [inline]
virtio_transport_alloc_skb+0x90/0x11e0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:58
virtio_transport_reset_no_sock net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:957 [inline]
virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1279/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1387
vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
CPU: 1 PID: 10664 Comm: kworker/1:5 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00146-g9f3ebbef746f #3
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-1.fc38 04/01/2014
Workqueue: vsock-loopback vsock_loopback_work
=====================================================
The following simple reproducer can cause the issue described above:
int main(void)
{
int sock;
struct sockaddr_vm addr = {
.svm_family = AF_VSOCK,
.svm_cid = VMADDR_CID_ANY,
.svm_port = 1234,
};
sock = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
return 0;
}
This issue occurs because the `buf_alloc` and `fwd_cnt` fields of the
`struct virtio_vsock_hdr` are not initialized when a new skb is allocated
in `virtio_transport_alloc_skb()`. This patch resolves the issue by
initializing these fields during allocation.
Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index 352d042b130b..102673bef189 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
hdr->dst_port = cpu_to_le32(dst_port);
hdr->flags = cpu_to_le32(info->flags);
hdr->len = cpu_to_le32(len);
+ hdr->buf_alloc = cpu_to_le32(0);
+ hdr->fwd_cnt = cpu_to_le32(0);
if (info->msg && len > 0) {
payload = skb_put(skb, len);
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-10-26 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-26 15:01 Shigeru Yoshida [this message]
2023-10-27 8:01 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-10-27 8:18 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-10-27 8:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-11-02 5:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-11-02 13:30 ` Shigeru Yoshida
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231026150154.3536433-1-syoshida@redhat.com \
--to=syoshida@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®