From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B98C4332F for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 17:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231834AbjKHRsV (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50796 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230202AbjKHRsT (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:48:19 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 419201BEF for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 09:48:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C39BDC433C9; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 17:48:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1699465696; bh=B3D8kn+YAuTi2y8lgXrgSAq8tNXjJQV5oZRUhMOzh4I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KpYEkL08STie+f6FHsECybos+SkhZy/VhqZCt0AROESLGuTCGXX1in2v2Ct2RB7pq HLLMMct+beCFwVVqoA4CM+YkEfd52io5bYbvx2GwXdu0mEmlUxQxtcakhIy+Je3HkT 3rL6/O9GdaMx+b9IshEs013pU1Ak/DuBlWXnhSwE= Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 09:48:16 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Lasse Collin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/xz: Add ARM64 BCJ filter Message-Id: <20231108094816.5532cac69a4b8541952f44c5@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20231108194448.674cd0ad@kaneli> References: <20231108194448.674cd0ad@kaneli> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 19:44:48 +0200 Lasse Collin wrote: > ARM64 kernel decompression is done by bootloaders but > the filter can still be useful, for example, for Squashfs. > > A duplicated check for XZ_DEC_ARM in xz_private.h was omitted too. There's nothing here that uses the new functionality? Is a squashfs patch expected?