From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
erdemaktas@google.com, Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
Subject: Re: KVM: X86: Make bus clock frequency for vapic timer (bus lock -> bus clock) (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: X86: Make bus lock frequency for vapic timer) configurable
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:29:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231110002953.GB1102144@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZU0BASXWcck85r90@google.com>
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 07:55:45AM -0800,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 12:03:35PM -0800, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> wrote:
> > > I think I know the answer, but do you have any tests for this new feature?
> >
> > If you mean kvm kselftest, no.
> > I have
> > - TDX patched qemu
> > - kvm-unit-tests: test_apic_timer_one_shot() @ kvm-unit-tests/x86/apic.c
> > TDX version is found at https://github.com/intel/kvm-unit-tests-tdx
> > We're planning to upstream the changes for TDX
> >
> > How far do we want to go?
> > - Run kvm-unit-tests with TDX. What I have right now.
> > - kvm-unit-tests: extend qemu for default VM case and update
> > test_apic_timer_one_host()
>
> Hrm, I'm not sure that we can do a whole lot for test_apic_timer_one_shot(). Or
> rather, I'm not sure it's worth the effort to try and add coverage beyond what's
> already there.
>
> As for TDX, *if* we extend KUT, please don't make it depend on TDX. Very few people
> have access to TDX platforms and anything CoCo is pretty much guaranteed to be harder
> to debug.
It made the test cases work with TDX + UEFI bios by adjusting command line to
invoke qemu. And skip unsuitable tests.
Maybe we can generalize the way to twist qemu command line.
> > - kselftest
> > Right now kvm kselftest doesn't have test cases even for in-kernel IRQCHIP
> > creation.
>
> Selftests always create an in-kernel APIC. And I think selftests are perfectly
> suited to complement the coverage provided by KUT. Specifically, the failure
> scenario for this is that KVM emulates at 1Ghz whereas TDX advertises 25Mhz, i.e.
> the test case we want is to verify that the APIC timer doesn't expire early.
>
> There's no need for any APIC infrastructure, e.g. a selftest doesn't even need to
> handle an interrupt. Get the TSC frequency from KVM, program up an arbitrary APIC
> bus clock frequency, set TMICT such that it expires waaaay in the future, and then
> verify that the APIC timer counts reasonably close to the programmed frequency.
> E.g. if the test sets the bus clock to 25Mhz, the "drift" due to KVM counting at
> 1Ghz should be super obvious.
Oh, only check the register value without interrupt. Good idea. Let me give it
a try.
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-10 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-07 19:22 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: X86: Make bus lock frequency for vapic timer configurable isaku.yamahata
2023-11-07 19:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Make the hardcoded APIC bus frequency vm variable isaku.yamahata
2023-11-07 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: X86: Add a capability to configure bus frequency for APIC timer isaku.yamahata
2023-11-07 19:59 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 23:41 ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-11-10 5:37 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-10 14:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-07 19:29 ` KVM: X86: Make bus clock frequency for vapic timer (bus lock -> bus clock) (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: X86: Make bus lock frequency for vapic timer) configurable Isaku Yamahata
2023-11-07 20:03 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 23:54 ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-11-09 15:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-10 0:29 ` Isaku Yamahata [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231110002953.GB1102144@ls.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®