From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
Guangwu Zhang <guazhang@redhat.com>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 resend] lib/group_cpus.c: avoid to acquire cpu hotplug lock in group_cpus_evenly
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 12:00:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231120120059.ef0614c2295b2102100cb56e@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231120083559.285174-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:35:59 +0800 Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> group_cpus_evenly() could be part of storage driver's error handler,
> such as nvme driver, when may happen during CPU hotplug, in which
> storage queue has to drain its pending IOs because all CPUs associated
> with the queue are offline and the queue is becoming inactive. And
> handling IO needs error handler to provide forward progress.
>
> Then dead lock is caused:
>
> 1) inside CPU hotplug handler, CPU hotplug lock is held, and blk-mq's
> handler is waiting for inflight IO
>
> 2) error handler is waiting for CPU hotplug lock
>
> 3) inflight IO can't be completed in blk-mq's CPU hotplug handler because
> error handling can't provide forward progress.
>
> Solve the deadlock by not holding CPU hotplug lock in group_cpus_evenly(),
> in which two stage spreads are taken: 1) the 1st stage is over all present
> CPUs; 2) the end stage is over all other CPUs.
>
> Turns out the two stage spread just needs consistent 'cpu_present_mask', and
> remove the CPU hotplug lock by storing it into one local cache. This way
> doesn't change correctness, because all CPUs are still covered.
I'm not sure what is the intended merge path for this, but I can do lib/.
Do you think that a -stable backport is needed? It sounds that way.
If so, are we able to identify a suitable Fixes: target? That would
predate f7b3ea8cf72f3 ("genirq/affinity: Move group_cpus_evenly() into
lib/").
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-20 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-20 8:35 Ming Lei
2023-11-20 20:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2023-12-06 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2023-12-09 2:27 ` Ming Lei
2023-12-07 0:41 ` Yury Norov
2023-12-07 0:54 ` Andrew Morton
2023-12-07 1:01 ` Yury Norov
2023-12-07 1:11 ` Ming Lei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-09-22 8:04 Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231120120059.ef0614c2295b2102100cb56e@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=guazhang@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®