From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/21] switch nfsd_client_rmdir() to use of simple_recursive_removal()
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 06:04:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231124060422.576198-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231124060200.GR38156@ZenIV>
nfsd_client_rmdir() open-codes a subset of simple_recursive_removal().
Conversion to calling simple_recursive_removal() allows to clean things
up quite a bit.
While we are at it, nfsdfs_create_files() doesn't need to mess with "pick
the reference to struct nfsdfs_client from the already created parent" -
the caller already knows it (that's where the parent got it from,
after all), so we might as well just pass it as an explicit argument.
So __get_nfsdfs_client() is only needed in get_nfsdfs_client() and
can be folded in there.
Incidentally, the locking in get_nfsdfs_client() is too heavy - we don't
need ->i_rwsem for that, ->i_lock serves just fine.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 70 ++++++++++--------------------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
index 3e15b72f421d..50df5e9d0069 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
@@ -1236,63 +1236,34 @@ static inline void _nfsd_symlink(struct dentry *parent, const char *name,
#endif
-static void clear_ncl(struct inode *inode)
+static void clear_ncl(struct dentry *dentry)
{
+ struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
struct nfsdfs_client *ncl = inode->i_private;
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
inode->i_private = NULL;
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
kref_put(&ncl->cl_ref, ncl->cl_release);
}
-static struct nfsdfs_client *__get_nfsdfs_client(struct inode *inode)
-{
- struct nfsdfs_client *nc = inode->i_private;
-
- if (nc)
- kref_get(&nc->cl_ref);
- return nc;
-}
-
struct nfsdfs_client *get_nfsdfs_client(struct inode *inode)
{
struct nfsdfs_client *nc;
- inode_lock_shared(inode);
- nc = __get_nfsdfs_client(inode);
- inode_unlock_shared(inode);
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ nc = inode->i_private;
+ if (nc)
+ kref_get(&nc->cl_ref);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
return nc;
}
-/* from __rpc_unlink */
-static void nfsdfs_remove_file(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
-{
- int ret;
-
- clear_ncl(d_inode(dentry));
- dget(dentry);
- ret = simple_unlink(dir, dentry);
- d_drop(dentry);
- fsnotify_unlink(dir, dentry);
- dput(dentry);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
-}
-
-static void nfsdfs_remove_files(struct dentry *root)
-{
- struct dentry *dentry, *tmp;
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(dentry, tmp, &root->d_subdirs, d_child) {
- if (!simple_positive(dentry)) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1); /* I think this can't happen? */
- continue;
- }
- nfsdfs_remove_file(d_inode(root), dentry);
- }
-}
/* XXX: cut'n'paste from simple_fill_super; figure out if we could share
* code instead. */
static int nfsdfs_create_files(struct dentry *root,
const struct tree_descr *files,
+ struct nfsdfs_client *ncl,
struct dentry **fdentries)
{
struct inode *dir = d_inode(root);
@@ -1311,8 +1282,9 @@ static int nfsdfs_create_files(struct dentry *root,
dput(dentry);
goto out;
}
+ kref_get(&ncl->cl_ref);
inode->i_fop = files->ops;
- inode->i_private = __get_nfsdfs_client(dir);
+ inode->i_private = ncl;
d_add(dentry, inode);
fsnotify_create(dir, dentry);
if (fdentries)
@@ -1321,7 +1293,6 @@ static int nfsdfs_create_files(struct dentry *root,
inode_unlock(dir);
return 0;
out:
- nfsdfs_remove_files(root);
inode_unlock(dir);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -1341,7 +1312,7 @@ struct dentry *nfsd_client_mkdir(struct nfsd_net *nn,
dentry = nfsd_mkdir(nn->nfsd_client_dir, ncl, name);
if (IS_ERR(dentry)) /* XXX: tossing errors? */
return NULL;
- ret = nfsdfs_create_files(dentry, files, fdentries);
+ ret = nfsdfs_create_files(dentry, files, ncl, fdentries);
if (ret) {
nfsd_client_rmdir(dentry);
return NULL;
@@ -1352,20 +1323,7 @@ struct dentry *nfsd_client_mkdir(struct nfsd_net *nn,
/* Taken from __rpc_rmdir: */
void nfsd_client_rmdir(struct dentry *dentry)
{
- struct inode *dir = d_inode(dentry->d_parent);
- struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
- int ret;
-
- inode_lock(dir);
- nfsdfs_remove_files(dentry);
- clear_ncl(inode);
- dget(dentry);
- ret = simple_rmdir(dir, dentry);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
- d_drop(dentry);
- fsnotify_rmdir(dir, dentry);
- dput(dentry);
- inode_unlock(dir);
+ simple_recursive_removal(dentry, clear_ncl);
}
static int nfsd_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-24 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-24 6:02 [RFC][PATCHSET v3] simplifying fast_dput(), dentry_kill() et.al Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` Al Viro [this message]
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] coda_flag_children(): cope with dentries turning negative Al Viro
2023-11-24 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-24 22:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] dentry: switch the lists of children to hlist Al Viro
2023-11-24 7:44 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-11-24 7:55 ` Al Viro
2023-11-24 8:02 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] centralize killing dentry from shrink list Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] shrink_dentry_list(): no need to check that dentry refcount is marked dead Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] fast_dput(): having ->d_delete() is not reason to delay refcount decrement Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] fast_dput(): handle underflows gracefully Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] fast_dput(): new rules for refcount Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] __dput_to_list(): do decrement of refcount in the callers Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] make retain_dentry() neutral with respect to refcounting Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] __dentry_kill(): get consistent rules for victim's refcount Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] dentry_kill(): don't bother with retain_dentry() on slow path Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] Call retain_dentry() with refcount 0 Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] fold the call of retain_dentry() into fast_dput() Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] don't try to cut corners in shrink_lock_dentry() Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] fold dentry_kill() into dput() Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] to_shrink_list(): call only if refcount is 0 Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] switch select_collect{,2}() to use of to_shrink_list() Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] d_prune_aliases(): use a shrink list Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] __dentry_kill(): new locking scheme Al Viro
2025-07-07 17:20 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 17:29 ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 17:43 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 18:00 ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 18:11 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 19:31 ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 20:00 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 20:31 ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 20:39 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 20:49 ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 20:52 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 20:59 ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 21:06 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 21:32 ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 21:47 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 22:19 ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 22:37 ` Al Viro
2025-07-08 4:45 ` Max Kellermann
2026-01-21 21:55 ` Al Viro
2026-01-22 6:24 ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 22:26 ` Al Viro
2023-11-24 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] retain_dentry(): introduce a trimmed-down lockless variant Al Viro
2023-11-24 21:28 ` [RFC][PATCHSET v3] simplifying fast_dput(), dentry_kill() et.al Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231124060422.576198-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®