mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/21] switch nfsd_client_rmdir() to use of simple_recursive_removal()
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 06:04:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231124060422.576198-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231124060200.GR38156@ZenIV>

nfsd_client_rmdir() open-codes a subset of simple_recursive_removal().
Conversion to calling simple_recursive_removal() allows to clean things
up quite a bit.

While we are at it, nfsdfs_create_files() doesn't need to mess with "pick
the reference to struct nfsdfs_client from the already created parent" -
the caller already knows it (that's where the parent got it from,
after all), so we might as well just pass it as an explicit argument.
So __get_nfsdfs_client() is only needed in get_nfsdfs_client() and
can be folded in there.

Incidentally, the locking in get_nfsdfs_client() is too heavy - we don't
need ->i_rwsem for that, ->i_lock serves just fine.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 70 ++++++++++--------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
index 3e15b72f421d..50df5e9d0069 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
@@ -1236,63 +1236,34 @@ static inline void _nfsd_symlink(struct dentry *parent, const char *name,
 
 #endif
 
-static void clear_ncl(struct inode *inode)
+static void clear_ncl(struct dentry *dentry)
 {
+	struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
 	struct nfsdfs_client *ncl = inode->i_private;
 
+	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 	inode->i_private = NULL;
+	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 	kref_put(&ncl->cl_ref, ncl->cl_release);
 }
 
-static struct nfsdfs_client *__get_nfsdfs_client(struct inode *inode)
-{
-	struct nfsdfs_client *nc = inode->i_private;
-
-	if (nc)
-		kref_get(&nc->cl_ref);
-	return nc;
-}
-
 struct nfsdfs_client *get_nfsdfs_client(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	struct nfsdfs_client *nc;
 
-	inode_lock_shared(inode);
-	nc = __get_nfsdfs_client(inode);
-	inode_unlock_shared(inode);
+	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+	nc = inode->i_private;
+	if (nc)
+		kref_get(&nc->cl_ref);
+	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 	return nc;
 }
-/* from __rpc_unlink */
-static void nfsdfs_remove_file(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	clear_ncl(d_inode(dentry));
-	dget(dentry);
-	ret = simple_unlink(dir, dentry);
-	d_drop(dentry);
-	fsnotify_unlink(dir, dentry);
-	dput(dentry);
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
-}
-
-static void nfsdfs_remove_files(struct dentry *root)
-{
-	struct dentry *dentry, *tmp;
-
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(dentry, tmp, &root->d_subdirs, d_child) {
-		if (!simple_positive(dentry)) {
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(1); /* I think this can't happen? */
-			continue;
-		}
-		nfsdfs_remove_file(d_inode(root), dentry);
-	}
-}
 
 /* XXX: cut'n'paste from simple_fill_super; figure out if we could share
  * code instead. */
 static  int nfsdfs_create_files(struct dentry *root,
 				const struct tree_descr *files,
+				struct nfsdfs_client *ncl,
 				struct dentry **fdentries)
 {
 	struct inode *dir = d_inode(root);
@@ -1311,8 +1282,9 @@ static  int nfsdfs_create_files(struct dentry *root,
 			dput(dentry);
 			goto out;
 		}
+		kref_get(&ncl->cl_ref);
 		inode->i_fop = files->ops;
-		inode->i_private = __get_nfsdfs_client(dir);
+		inode->i_private = ncl;
 		d_add(dentry, inode);
 		fsnotify_create(dir, dentry);
 		if (fdentries)
@@ -1321,7 +1293,6 @@ static  int nfsdfs_create_files(struct dentry *root,
 	inode_unlock(dir);
 	return 0;
 out:
-	nfsdfs_remove_files(root);
 	inode_unlock(dir);
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
@@ -1341,7 +1312,7 @@ struct dentry *nfsd_client_mkdir(struct nfsd_net *nn,
 	dentry = nfsd_mkdir(nn->nfsd_client_dir, ncl, name);
 	if (IS_ERR(dentry)) /* XXX: tossing errors? */
 		return NULL;
-	ret = nfsdfs_create_files(dentry, files, fdentries);
+	ret = nfsdfs_create_files(dentry, files, ncl, fdentries);
 	if (ret) {
 		nfsd_client_rmdir(dentry);
 		return NULL;
@@ -1352,20 +1323,7 @@ struct dentry *nfsd_client_mkdir(struct nfsd_net *nn,
 /* Taken from __rpc_rmdir: */
 void nfsd_client_rmdir(struct dentry *dentry)
 {
-	struct inode *dir = d_inode(dentry->d_parent);
-	struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
-	int ret;
-
-	inode_lock(dir);
-	nfsdfs_remove_files(dentry);
-	clear_ncl(inode);
-	dget(dentry);
-	ret = simple_rmdir(dir, dentry);
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
-	d_drop(dentry);
-	fsnotify_rmdir(dir, dentry);
-	dput(dentry);
-	inode_unlock(dir);
+	simple_recursive_removal(dentry, clear_ncl);
 }
 
 static int nfsd_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
-- 
2.39.2


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-24  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-24  6:02 [RFC][PATCHSET v3] simplifying fast_dput(), dentry_kill() et.al Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04 ` Al Viro [this message]
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 02/21] coda_flag_children(): cope with dentries turning negative Al Viro
2023-11-24 21:22     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-24 22:58       ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 03/21] dentry: switch the lists of children to hlist Al Viro
2023-11-24  7:44     ` Amir Goldstein
2023-11-24  7:55       ` Al Viro
2023-11-24  8:02         ` Amir Goldstein
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 04/21] centralize killing dentry from shrink list Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 05/21] shrink_dentry_list(): no need to check that dentry refcount is marked dead Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 06/21] fast_dput(): having ->d_delete() is not reason to delay refcount decrement Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 07/21] fast_dput(): handle underflows gracefully Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 08/21] fast_dput(): new rules for refcount Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 09/21] __dput_to_list(): do decrement of refcount in the callers Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 10/21] make retain_dentry() neutral with respect to refcounting Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 11/21] __dentry_kill(): get consistent rules for victim's refcount Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 12/21] dentry_kill(): don't bother with retain_dentry() on slow path Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 13/21] Call retain_dentry() with refcount 0 Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 14/21] fold the call of retain_dentry() into fast_dput() Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 15/21] don't try to cut corners in shrink_lock_dentry() Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 16/21] fold dentry_kill() into dput() Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 17/21] to_shrink_list(): call only if refcount is 0 Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 18/21] switch select_collect{,2}() to use of to_shrink_list() Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 19/21] d_prune_aliases(): use a shrink list Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 20/21] __dentry_kill(): new locking scheme Al Viro
2025-07-07 17:20     ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 17:29       ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 17:43         ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 18:00           ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 18:11             ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 19:31               ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 20:00                 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 20:31                   ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 20:39                     ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 20:49                       ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 20:52                         ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 20:59                           ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 21:06                             ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 21:32                               ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 21:47                                 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-07 22:19                                   ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 22:37                                     ` Al Viro
2025-07-08  4:45                                       ` Max Kellermann
2026-01-21 21:55                                         ` Al Viro
2026-01-22  6:24                                           ` Al Viro
2025-07-07 22:26       ` Al Viro
2023-11-24  6:04   ` [PATCH v3 21/21] retain_dentry(): introduce a trimmed-down lockless variant Al Viro
2023-11-24 21:28 ` [RFC][PATCHSET v3] simplifying fast_dput(), dentry_kill() et.al Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231124060422.576198-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®