From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] vfio: Drop vfio_file_iommu_group() stub to fudge around a KVM wart
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:10:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231130001000.543240-1-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
Drop the vfio_file_iommu_group() stub and instead unconditionally declare
the function to fudge around a KVM wart where KVM tries to do symbol_get()
on vfio_file_iommu_group() (and other VFIO symbols) even if CONFIG_VFIO=n.
Ensuring the symbol is always declared fixes a PPC build error when
modules are also disabled, in which case symbol_get() simply points at the
address of the symbol (with some attributes shenanigans). Because KVM
does symbol_get() instead of directly depending on VFIO, the lack of a
fully defined symbol is not problematic (ugly, but "fine").
arch/powerpc/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/vfio.c:89:7:
error: attribute declaration must precede definition [-Werror,-Wignored-attributes]
fn = symbol_get(vfio_file_iommu_group);
^
include/linux/module.h:805:60: note: expanded from macro 'symbol_get'
#define symbol_get(x) ({ extern typeof(x) x __attribute__((weak,visibility("hidden"))); &(x); })
^
include/linux/vfio.h:294:35: note: previous definition is here
static inline struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
^
arch/powerpc/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/vfio.c:89:7:
error: attribute declaration must precede definition [-Werror,-Wignored-attributes]
fn = symbol_get(vfio_file_iommu_group);
^
include/linux/module.h:805:65: note: expanded from macro 'symbol_get'
#define symbol_get(x) ({ extern typeof(x) x __attribute__((weak,visibility("hidden"))); &(x); })
^
include/linux/vfio.h:294:35: note: previous definition is here
static inline struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
^
2 errors generated.
Although KVM is firmly in the wrong (there is zero reason for KVM to build
virt/kvm/vfio.c when VFIO is disabled), fudge around the error in VFIO as
the stub is unnecessary and doesn't serve its intended purpose (KVM is the
only external user of vfio_file_iommu_group()), and there is an in-flight
series to clean up the entire KVM<->VFIO interaction, i.e. fixing this in
KVM would result in more churn in the long run, and the stub needs to go
away regardless.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308251949.5IiaV0sz-lkp@intel.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309030741.82aLACDG-lkp@intel.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309110914.QLH0LU6L-lkp@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0-v1-08396538817d+13c5-vfio_kvm_kconfig_jgg@nvidia.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230916003118.2540661-1-seanjc@google.com
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Fixes: c1cce6d079b8 ("vfio: Compile vfio_group infrastructure optionally")
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
include/linux/vfio.h | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index 454e9295970c..a65b2513f8cd 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -289,16 +289,12 @@ void vfio_combine_iova_ranges(struct rb_root_cached *root, u32 cur_nodes,
/*
* External user API
*/
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP)
struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file);
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP)
bool vfio_file_is_group(struct file *file);
bool vfio_file_has_dev(struct file *file, struct vfio_device *device);
#else
-static inline struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-
static inline bool vfio_file_is_group(struct file *file)
{
return false;
base-commit: ae2667cd8a479bb5abd6e24c12fcc9ef5bc06d75
--
2.43.0.rc1.413.gea7ed67945-goog
next reply other threads:[~2023-11-30 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-30 0:10 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-11-30 0:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-30 18:50 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231130001000.543240-1-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®