From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>, Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 10/28] KVM: x86/pmu: Explicitly check for RDPMC of unsupported Intel PMC types
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 16:03:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231202000417.922113-11-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231202000417.922113-1-seanjc@google.com>
Explicitly check for attempts to read unsupported PMC types instead of
letting the bounds check fail. Functionally, letting the check fail is
ok, but it's unnecessarily subtle and does a poor job of documenting the
architectural behavior that KVM is emulating.
Opportunistically add macros for the type vs. index to further document
what is going on.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 644de27bd48a..bd4f4bdf5419 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
/* Perf's "BASE" is wildly misleading, this is a single-bit flag, not a base. */
#define INTEL_RDPMC_FIXED INTEL_PMC_FIXED_RDPMC_BASE
+#define INTEL_RDPMC_TYPE_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
+#define INTEL_RDPMC_INDEX_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
+
#define MSR_PMC_FULL_WIDTH_BIT (MSR_IA32_PMC0 - MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)
static void reprogram_fixed_counters(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u64 data)
@@ -82,9 +85,13 @@ static struct kvm_pmc *intel_rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
/*
* Fixed PMCs are supported on all architectural PMUs. Note, KVM only
* emulates fixed PMCs for PMU v2+, but the flag itself is still valid,
- * i.e. let RDPMC fail due to accessing a non-existent counter.
+ * i.e. let RDPMC fail due to accessing a non-existent counter. Reject
+ * attempts to read all other types, which are unknown/unsupported.
*/
- idx &= ~INTEL_RDPMC_FIXED;
+ if (idx & INTEL_RDPMC_TYPE_MASK & ~INTEL_RDPMC_FIXED)
+ return NULL;
+
+ idx &= INTEL_RDPMC_INDEX_MASK;
if (fixed) {
counters = pmu->fixed_counters;
num_counters = pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters;
--
2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-02 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-02 0:03 [PATCH v9 00/28] KVM: x86/pmu: selftests: Fixes and new tests Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:03 ` [PATCH v9 01/28] KVM: x86/pmu: Always treat Fixed counters as available when supported Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:03 ` [PATCH v9 02/28] KVM: x86/pmu: Allow programming events that match unsupported arch events Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:03 ` [PATCH v9 03/28] KVM: x86/pmu: Remove KVM's enumeration of Intel's architectural encodings Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:03 ` [PATCH v9 04/28] KVM: x86/pmu: Setup fixed counters' eventsel during PMU initialization Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:03 ` [PATCH v9 05/28] KVM: x86/pmu: Get eventsel for fixed counters from perf Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:03 ` [PATCH v9 06/28] KVM: x86/pmu: Don't ignore bits 31:30 for RDPMC index on AMD Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:03 ` [PATCH v9 07/28] KVM: x86/pmu: Prioritize VMX interception over #GP on RDPMC due to bad index Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:03 ` [PATCH v9 08/28] KVM: x86/pmu: Apply "fast" RDPMC only to Intel PMUs Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:03 ` [PATCH v9 09/28] KVM: x86/pmu: Disallow "fast" RDPMC for architectural " Sean Christopherson
2023-12-11 6:03 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-12-02 0:03 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-12-11 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 10/28] KVM: x86/pmu: Explicitly check for RDPMC of unsupported Intel PMC types Mi, Dapeng
2023-12-11 21:33 ` Jim Mattson
2023-12-11 23:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-12-12 2:26 ` Jim Mattson
2023-12-13 2:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 11/28] KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 12/28] KVM: selftests: Drop the "name" param from KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE() Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 13/28] KVM: selftests: Extend {kvm,this}_pmu_has() to support fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 14/28] KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h and lib/pmu.c for common PMU assets Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 15/28] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 16/28] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 17/28] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 18/28] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 19/28] KVM: selftests: Add functional test for Intel's fixed PMU counters Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 20/28] KVM: selftests: Expand PMU counters test to verify LLC events Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 21/28] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to query if the PMU module param is enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 22/28] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to read integer module params Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 23/28] KVM: selftests: Query module param to detect FEP in MSR filtering test Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 24/28] KVM: selftests: Move KVM_FEP macro into common library header Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 25/28] KVM: selftests: Test PMC virtualization with forced emulation Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 26/28] KVM: selftests: Add a forced emulation variation of KVM_ASM_SAFE() Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 27/28] KVM: selftests: Add helpers for safe and safe+forced RDMSR, RDPMC, and XGETBV Sean Christopherson
2023-12-02 0:04 ` [PATCH v9 28/28] KVM: selftests: Extend PMU counters test to validate RDPMC after WRMSR Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231202000417.922113-11-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®