From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14842C4167B for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 10:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231961AbjLGKNX (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2023 05:13:23 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38296 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232072AbjLGKNM (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2023 05:13:12 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC6AFD57 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 02:13:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBC34C433C8; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 10:13:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1701943992; bh=jjIqC4iSn/VFDe+Xa9h9ciWtGqh8N3pSlXrWjTTjMaI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=um9XVhMk6ydG46DAOeQvOYixYw3Lvl2SRRiPz7BFVe5hWSWwj/iBaUMibhPo8IHnp imwk05eZz98/uY/w6+KOpBNw3Ptesy6eqokQGK4kO+UoE0kWa3EmiwxEm/LoC3aKlG zxBuGQS1oGOU7Za1fr5e9R6SulbE6J6q0qaNPOzU= Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 11:13:08 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Yann Sionneau Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: regression in 6.1.yy branch: LTP test preadv03 fails Message-ID: <2023120747-domain-angled-d633@gregkh> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:05:15AM +0100, Yann Sionneau wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed yesterday that LTP test preadv03 now fails since 6.1.64 (it also > fails on 6.1.65). > > 6.6.4, 6.6.3, 6.5.0 and 6.2.0 seem to be unaffected. > > I tested this on x86_64 and kvx arch (the latter is not upstream). > > I can see some ext4 related commits on 6.1.64 and 6.1.65 changes, maybe it's > related, therefore I add ext4 mailing list as CC. > > I didn't run git bisect on this so far because I noticed building an x86_64 > ubuntu kernel on my laptop was taking ages. Maybe someone is more used to > dealing with this and can bisect this way faster than me. Should be fixed in the latest 6.1.y-rc release, right? If not, please let me know. thanks, greg k-h