From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Fix buffer max_data_size with max_event_size
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2023 17:09:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231209170925.71d4e02e@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231209170139.33c1b452@gandalf.local.home>
On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 17:01:39 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> The maximum ring buffer data size is the maximum size of data that can be
> recorded on the ring buffer. Events must be smaller than the sub buffer
> data size minus any meta data. This size is checked before trying to
> allocate from the ring buffer because the allocation assumes that the size
> will fit on the sub buffer.
>
> The maximum size was calculated as the size of a sub buffer page (which is
> currently PAGE_SIZE minus the sub buffer header) minus the size of the
> meta data of an individual event. But it missed the possible adding of a
> time stamp for events that are added long enough apart that the event meta
> data can't hold the time delta.
>
> When an event is added that is greater than the current BUF_MAX_DATA_SIZE
> minus the size of a time stamp, but still less than or equal to
> BUF_MAX_DATA_SIZE, the ring buffer would go into an infinite loop, looking
> for a page that can hold the event. Luckily, there's a check for this loop
> and after 1000 iterations and a warning is emitted and the ring buffer is
> disabled. But this should never happen.
>
> This can happen when a large event is added first, or after a long period
> where an absolute timestamp is prefixed to the event, increasing its size
> by 8 bytes. This passes the check and then goes into the algorithm that
> causes the infinite loop.
>
> Fix this by creating a BUF_MAX_EVENT_SIZE to be used to determine if the
> passed in event is too big for the buffer.
>
Forgot to add:
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: a4543a2fa9ef3 ("ring-buffer: Get timestamp after event is allocated")
-- Steve
> Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> # (on IRC)
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 8d2a4f00eca9..a38e5a3c6803 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -378,6 +378,9 @@ static inline bool test_time_stamp(u64 delta)
> /* Max payload is BUF_PAGE_SIZE - header (8bytes) */
> #define BUF_MAX_DATA_SIZE (BUF_PAGE_SIZE - (sizeof(u32) * 2))
>
> +/* Events may have a time stamp attached to them */
> +#define BUF_MAX_EVENT_SIZE (BUF_MAX_DATA_SIZE - RB_LEN_TIME_EXTEND)
> +
> int ring_buffer_print_page_header(struct trace_seq *s)
> {
> struct buffer_data_page field;
> @@ -3810,7 +3813,7 @@ ring_buffer_lock_reserve(struct trace_buffer *buffer, unsigned long length)
> if (unlikely(atomic_read(&cpu_buffer->record_disabled)))
> goto out;
>
> - if (unlikely(length > BUF_MAX_DATA_SIZE))
> + if (unlikely(length > BUF_MAX_EVENT_SIZE))
> goto out;
>
> if (unlikely(trace_recursive_lock(cpu_buffer)))
> @@ -3960,7 +3963,7 @@ int ring_buffer_write(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
> if (atomic_read(&cpu_buffer->record_disabled))
> goto out;
>
> - if (length > BUF_MAX_DATA_SIZE)
> + if (length > BUF_MAX_EVENT_SIZE)
> goto out;
>
> if (unlikely(trace_recursive_lock(cpu_buffer)))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-09 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-09 22:01 Steven Rostedt
2023-12-09 22:09 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-12-11 11:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-12-12 11:44 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231209170925.71d4e02e@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®