From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C94014185A for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 17:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Lg3BYpM7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1702662978; x=1734198978; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=bvWrieDTMCdLIplUvEELQll1rjVPV1PTLEMOhNumt84=; b=Lg3BYpM7oucL+j+Hs6MT6/9SaZt3SDYC1bMLxZ08VHCDjaqQ/2MrWlXw Lc9m3LKKN3tGFwEpMxIWRyfaLGXsCoEZnzRAgqzNw7Jf3tce73YwPHI74 0ykDdukd1u2YzgUU5lt0EqKWHumR54TTJ+G2UI34S5zZWzmyPRpdWRNMX agIznoFNoiftThvy+W0a/BEkmSfp7OxpNDEmhjaQqtkoPI/xnSU/+EHGd JdK3RMUhIB8W46yaW1mpBJTZwfNYISWKcm1gUXGcQwSASSCO82f50S6ii ZvZCiE7jJEKPQf9mGvWNKImVdNeHoIuBGfvplchYN/UKsNo+BaFgGJnCd A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10925"; a="2397706" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,279,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="2397706" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Dec 2023 09:56:17 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10925"; a="898219349" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,279,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="898219349" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2023 09:56:15 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rECQ0-0000Zm-3A; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 17:56:12 +0000 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 01:55:42 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kalesh Singh Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Fuad Tabba Subject: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c:15:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_kvm_stacktrace_info' was not declared. Should it be static? Message-ID: <202312160147.tv9kuUiH-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: 3f7168591ebf7bbdb91797d02b1afaf00a4289b1 commit: 879e5ac7b2e4db05799a905b5a07fc9e5dedf651 KVM: arm64: Prepare non-protected nVHE hypervisor stacktrace date: 1 year, 5 months ago config: arm64-randconfig-r112-20231117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312160147.tv9kuUiH-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312160147.tv9kuUiH-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312160147.tv9kuUiH-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c:12:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_overflow_stack' was not declared. Should it be static? >> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c:15:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_kvm_stacktrace_info' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/__pcpu_scope_kvm_stacktrace_info +15 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c 11 > 12 DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)], overflow_stack) 13 __aligned(16); 14 > 15 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_nvhe_stacktrace_info, kvm_stacktrace_info); 16 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki