From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647D949F7E for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 21:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CAiO43n6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1702674686; x=1734210686; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=73V91GoV1H8usB4OfHXnPDk6fIOp5q9JXo1ugLiO5G4=; b=CAiO43n6+pCMU2943ilRvfMr/BSMTmF51CCHElQoS9QwFctVb8gQUChV bofHicKHLvNZ3UcEuKVdKZRu2dTEby9+QMcNP/O8nYPpcFLEGVJU56cv6 EndXZyFztegyBIi7Fuh6Wt4rgwrJVUIu9jWcxF8NZ0zgCkM/1xQibll67 A1HpqxQyv9gRGj8TAYL949GS3ddT4SWyEH1KO/9ObwrJcg+ktiMNBaIwk hruxk4dupxtV6hbkr3QxW9LKMnnlKOJIK6uvkY7iDDxOs6VdZxst/dUzd CDoRuFDRV5IsurwyKfFpEWj0csU9AuFfNBiVqG08pGzaj/B6YEr4+5Qkb A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10925"; a="380325707" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,279,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="380325707" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Dec 2023 13:11:25 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10925"; a="840787678" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,279,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="840787678" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2023 13:11:24 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rEFSr-0000lm-2V; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 21:11:21 +0000 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 05:11:12 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kalesh Singh Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Fuad Tabba Subject: arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:52:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page' was not declared. Should it be static? Message-ID: <202312160504.mmbGlWvN-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: 3f7168591ebf7bbdb91797d02b1afaf00a4289b1 commit: db129d486ebdf4e3168282236f9d9008b42cac7e KVM: arm64: Implement non-protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder date: 1 year, 5 months ago config: arm64-randconfig-r112-20231117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312160504.mmbGlWvN-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312160504.mmbGlWvN-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312160504.mmbGlWvN-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:52:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/__pcpu_scope_kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page +52 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c 51 > 52 DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page); 53 unsigned long kvm_arm_hyp_percpu_base[NR_CPUS]; 54 DECLARE_KVM_NVHE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_nvhe_init_params, kvm_init_params); 55 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki