From: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Defer RCU kthreads wakeup when CPU is dying
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:42:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231219044247.1708-1-hdanton@sina.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231218231916.11719-3-frederic@kernel.org>
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:19:15 +0100 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> +static void swake_up_one_online(struct swait_queue_head *wqh)
> +{
> + int cpu = get_cpu();
> +
> + /*
> + * If called from rcutree_report_cpu_starting(), wake up
> + * is dangerous that late in the CPU-down hotplug process. The
> + * scheduler might queue an ignored hrtimer. Defer the wake up
> + * to an online CPU instead.
> + */
But why is scheduler having any interest selecting a dying CPU for
adding a hrtimer on at the first place?
> + if (unlikely(cpu_is_offline(cpu))) {
> + int target;
> +
> + target = cpumask_any_and(housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_RCU),
> + cpu_online_mask);
> +
> + smp_call_function_single(target, swake_up_one_online_ipi,
> + wqh, 0);
> + put_cpu();
> + } else {
> + put_cpu();
> + swake_up_one(wqh);
> + }
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-19 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-18 23:19 [PATCH 0/3] timers & RCU: Fix TREE03 stalls Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-18 23:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] hrtimer: Report offline hrtimer enqueue Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-18 23:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Defer RCU kthreads wakeup when CPU is dying Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-19 3:38 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-12-19 11:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-20 3:01 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-12-20 15:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-21 0:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-12-19 4:42 ` Hillf Danton [this message]
2023-12-19 23:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-19 15:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-12-19 15:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-20 8:24 ` Z qiang
2023-12-20 15:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-08-12 9:10 ` Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)
2024-08-12 11:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-08-12 11:53 ` Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)
2023-12-18 23:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] rcu/exp: Remove full barrier upon main thread wakeup Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-19 1:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] timers & RCU: Fix TREE03 stalls Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231219044247.1708-1-hdanton@sina.com \
--to=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®