From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fd01.gateway.ufhost.com (fd01.gateway.ufhost.com [61.152.239.71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9BC5246; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 01:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=starfivetech.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=starfivetech.com Received: from EXMBX166.cuchost.com (unknown [175.102.18.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "EXMBX166", Issuer "EXMBX166" (not verified)) by fd01.gateway.ufhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF0A808F; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:23:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from EXMBX072.cuchost.com (172.16.6.82) by EXMBX166.cuchost.com (172.16.6.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:23:56 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (202.188.176.82) by EXMBX072.cuchost.com (172.16.6.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:23:52 +0800 From: Ji Sheng Teoh To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] dt-bindings: watchdog: starfive,jh7100-wdt: Add compatible for JH8100 Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:23:45 +0800 Message-ID: <20231220012345.17791-1-jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20231219-hankering-console-7de049490dab@spud> References: <20231219-hankering-console-7de049490dab@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCAS066.cuchost.com (172.16.6.26) To EXMBX072.cuchost.com (172.16.6.82) X-YovoleRuleAgent: yovoleflag Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:43:07 +0000 Conor Dooley wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:37:38PM +0800, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:41:37 +0100 > > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > =20 > > > On 18/12/2023 15:27, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote: =20 > > > >> > > > >> I have real doubts that you ever tested your entire solution > > > >> with this binding. Where is the DTS? > > > >> =20 > > > >=20 > > > > Currently, the DTS is still in internal and yet to upstream as > > > > it depends on [1]. =20 > > >=20 > > > Yeah, so you send untested code which cannot work or pass tests. > > > If you do not test your code, we need to be able to at least > > > verify it, so send your DTS. Otherwise I cannot trust that this > > > works at all.=20 > > Will submit it with DTS once things have cleared up. > > Thanks for the comment. =20 >=20 > [1] is not going to applied for a while since the SoC doesn't actually > exist yet and is pre-tapeout on an FPGA. I would just send the dts > patch adding the watchdog alongside the series, or else you'll be > waiting for quite a while. Or even link to the node on github or > whatever. >=20 Ok, will add the watchdog dts alongside this series and mention its dependency on [1]. Thanks.