mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brad Cowie <brad@faucet.nz>
To: aconole@redhat.com
Cc: brad@faucet.nz, coreteam@netfilter.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	dev@openvswitch.org, edumazet@google.com, fw@strlen.de,
	horms@kernel.org, kadlec@netfilter.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lucien.xin@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, pablo@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: nf_nat: fix action not being set for all ct states
Date: Thu,  4 Jan 2024 18:04:52 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240104050452.808076-1-brad@faucet.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7tle97eppk.fsf@redhat.com>

On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 04:10, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:

> LGTM.  I guess we should try to codify the specific flows that were used
> to flag this into the ovs selftest - we clearly have a missing case
> after NAT lookup.

Thanks for the review Aaron, and the sensible suggestion to add a
test to ovs to avoid this problem occuring again in future.

I've simplified our NAT ruleset and turned it into an ovs system test,
which I've submitted as a patch [1] to ovs-dev. The test reproduces
the issue introduced by ebddb1404900 and passes when e6345d2824a3
is applied.

[1]: https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2024-January/410476.html

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-04  5:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-21 22:43 Brad Cowie
2023-12-23 21:13 ` Simon Horman
2023-12-24  2:47   ` Brad Cowie
2023-12-28 15:59     ` Xin Long
2024-01-02 15:10   ` Aaron Conole
2024-01-03 10:26     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-01-04  5:04     ` Brad Cowie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240104050452.808076-1-brad@faucet.nz \
    --to=brad@faucet.nz \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®