From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <jack@suse.cz>,
<ritesh.list@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
<yukuai3@huawei.com>, <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 8/8] ext4: mark the group block bitmap as corrupted before reporting an error
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:20:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240104142040.2835097-9-libaokun1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104142040.2835097-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>
Otherwise unlocking the group in ext4_grp_locked_error may allow other
processes to modify the core block bitmap that is known to be corrupt.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 90fcf22db098..e2a63cf854a8 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -564,14 +564,14 @@ static void mb_free_blocks_double(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group);
blocknr += EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(sb), first + i);
+ ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
+ EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group,
inode ? inode->i_ino : 0,
blocknr,
"freeing block already freed "
"(bit %u)",
first + i);
- ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
- EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
}
mb_clear_bit(first + i, e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap);
}
@@ -1934,12 +1934,12 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group);
blocknr += EXT4_C2B(sbi, block);
+ ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
+ EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group,
inode ? inode->i_ino : 0, blocknr,
"freeing already freed block (bit %u); block bitmap corrupt.",
block);
- ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
- EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
return;
}
@@ -2412,12 +2412,12 @@ void ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
k = mb_find_next_zero_bit(buddy, max, 0);
if (k >= max) {
+ ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(ac->ac_sb,
+ e4b->bd_group,
+ EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
ext4_grp_locked_error(ac->ac_sb, e4b->bd_group, 0, 0,
"%d free clusters of order %d. But found 0",
grp->bb_counters[i], i);
- ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(ac->ac_sb,
- e4b->bd_group,
- EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
break;
}
ac->ac_found++;
@@ -2468,12 +2468,12 @@ void ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
* free blocks even though group info says we
* have free blocks
*/
+ ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
+ EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, 0, 0,
"%d free clusters as per "
"group info. But bitmap says 0",
free);
- ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
- EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
break;
}
@@ -2499,12 +2499,12 @@ void ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
if (WARN_ON(ex.fe_len <= 0))
break;
if (free < ex.fe_len) {
+ ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
+ EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, 0, 0,
"%d free clusters as per "
"group info. But got %d blocks",
free, ex.fe_len);
- ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
- EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
/*
* The number of free blocks differs. This mostly
* indicate that the bitmap is corrupt. So exit
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-04 14:20 [PATCH v3 0/8] ext4: fix divide error in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() Baokun Li
2024-01-04 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ext4: fix double-free of blocks due to wrong extents moved_len Baokun Li
2024-01-04 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ext4: do not trim the group with corrupted block bitmap Baokun Li
2024-01-04 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ext4: regenerate buddy after block freeing failed if under fc replay Baokun Li
2024-01-04 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ext4: avoid bb_free and bb_fragments inconsistency in mb_free_blocks() Baokun Li
2024-01-04 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ext4: avoid dividing by 0 in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() when block bitmap corrupt Baokun Li
2024-01-04 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ext4: avoid allocating blocks from corrupted group in ext4_mb_try_best_found() Baokun Li
2024-01-04 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ext4: avoid allocating blocks from corrupted group in ext4_mb_find_by_goal() Baokun Li
2024-01-04 14:20 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2024-02-04 4:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] ext4: fix divide error in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240104142040.2835097-9-libaokun1@huawei.com \
--to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®