From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3CB4168CC for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 19:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="wEzlG3U5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 128E9C43390; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 19:37:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1705088233; bh=ew3UB/+/Wu+260THz1eNJAhDnDXdfU5nnyjQIahxjUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wEzlG3U5nDzx9L1f8WqsXoRY7WdpEizjN1GQTtN0gd+d9jJjH17BtEYMazNQMDJXI W6nL74b1GpvuxK9SzFSntPUclhagGAJnW5YlMykBwGgGGcon20Uc4dq+8nyKYMkS7J BJt2ThgOLj8KFsNBpD034zC4x1DmBq7NgJJTFEp4= Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 20:37:10 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Bagas Sanjaya Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: Deliberately sending partial patch sets? Message-ID: <2024011247-caregiver-compacted-2e6b@gregkh> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 09:20:45PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > Hi, > > Let's say that there is a contributor who wish to send a patch set (e.g. > 20-30 patches in the series) to LKML. But instead of sending the full > series, he either do one of the following: > > * Send only the cover letter (analogous to movie trailers) > * Send only a few arbitrary patches in a series that are most important > (e.g. patch [01,04,11,18,23/30]) (analogous to match highlights) > * Send only the first few patches in a series (i.e. subject of one of > patches says [09/30]) (analogous to sample book chapters) > > The rest of patches are behind closed doors (i.e. not sent), possibly > behind charm-priced (pay)walls. > > Is the submission like above acceptable (when in review)? No, kernel development is done in public.