From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, maz@kernel.org
Cc: sdonthineni@nvidia.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dawei.li@shingroup.cn,
set_pte_at@outlook.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] irqchip/gic-v3: Implement read polling with dedicated API
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:57:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240122085716.2999875-2-dawei.li@shingroup.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122085716.2999875-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Kernel provide read*_poll_* API family to support looping based polling
code pattern like below:
while (...)
{
val = op(addr);
condition = cond(val);
if (condition)
break;
/* Maybe some timeout handling stuff */
cpu_relax();
udelay();
}
As such, use readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic() to implement atomic
register polling logic in gic-v3.
It's worth noting that this conversion would be impossilbe without
support of commit 7349a69cf312 ("iopoll: Do not use timekeeping in
read_poll_timeout_atomic()"), which remove time keeping code from
read_poll_timeout_atomic(), reason below:
Compared to other 'ordinary' device driver, IRQ chip driver is kinda
special, whose initialization(via init_IRQ()) happens pretty early,
even before timekeeping_init(). As a result, calling time keeping code
in irq chip init code is bogus.
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 98b0329b7154..020a67195b16 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/refcount.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h>
@@ -251,17 +252,16 @@ static inline void __iomem *gic_dist_base(struct irq_data *d)
static void gic_do_wait_for_rwp(void __iomem *base, u32 bit)
{
- u32 count = 1000000; /* 1s! */
+ u32 val;
+ int ret;
- while (readl_relaxed(base + GICD_CTLR) & bit) {
- count--;
- if (!count) {
- pr_err_ratelimited("RWP timeout, gone fishing\n");
- return;
- }
- cpu_relax();
- udelay(1);
- }
+ ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(base + GICD_CTLR,
+ val,
+ !(val & bit),
+ 1,
+ USEC_PER_SEC);
+ if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
+ pr_err_ratelimited("RWP timeout, gone fishing\n");
}
/* Wait for completion of a distributor change */
@@ -279,8 +279,8 @@ static void gic_redist_wait_for_rwp(void)
static void gic_enable_redist(bool enable)
{
void __iomem *rbase;
- u32 count = 1000000; /* 1s! */
u32 val;
+ int ret;
if (gic_data.flags & FLAGS_WORKAROUND_GICR_WAKER_MSM8996)
return;
@@ -301,14 +301,12 @@ static void gic_enable_redist(bool enable)
return; /* No PM support in this redistributor */
}
- while (--count) {
- val = readl_relaxed(rbase + GICR_WAKER);
- if (enable ^ (bool)(val & GICR_WAKER_ChildrenAsleep))
- break;
- cpu_relax();
- udelay(1);
- }
- if (!count)
+ ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(rbase + GICR_WAKER,
+ val,
+ enable ^ (bool)(val & GICR_WAKER_ChildrenAsleep),
+ 1,
+ USEC_PER_SEC);
+ if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
pr_err_ratelimited("redistributor failed to %s...\n",
enable ? "wakeup" : "sleep");
}
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 8:57 [PATCH v2 0/5] Minor cleanup on gic(v3) and genirq Dawei Li
2024-01-22 8:57 ` Dawei Li [this message]
2024-01-24 18:35 ` [tip: irq/core] irqchip/gic-v3: Use readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic() tip-bot2 for Dawei Li
2024-01-22 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] irqchip/gic(v3): Replace gic_irq() with irqd_to_hwirq() Dawei Li
2024-01-24 18:35 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Dawei Li
2024-01-22 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] genirq: Remove unneeded forward declaration Dawei Li
2024-01-24 18:35 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Dawei Li
2024-01-22 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] genirq: Initialize resend_node hlist for all irq_desc Dawei Li
2024-01-24 18:35 ` [tip: irq/core] genirq: Initialize resend_node hlist for all interrupt descriptors tip-bot2 for Dawei Li
2024-01-22 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] genirq: Introduce generic init_desc() Dawei Li
2024-01-24 18:35 ` [tip: irq/core] genirq: Deduplicate interrupt descriptor initialization tip-bot2 for Dawei Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240122085716.2999875-2-dawei.li@shingroup.cn \
--to=dawei.li@shingroup.cn \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=set_pte_at@outlook.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®