From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] keys: update key quotas in key_put()
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:12:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240124221225.GD1088@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240115120300.27606-1-lhenriques@suse.de>
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 12:03:00PM +0000, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Delaying key quotas update when key's refcount reaches 0 in key_put() has
> been causing some issues in fscrypt testing. This patches fixes this test
> flakiness by dealing with the quotas immediately, but leaving all the other
> clean-ups to the key garbage collector. Unfortunately, this means that we
> also need to switch to the irq-version of the spinlock that protects quota.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
> ---
> Hi David!
>
> I have these changes in my local disk for a while; I wanted to send them
> before EOY break but... yeah, it didn't happen. Anyway, I'm still sending
> it as an RFC as I'm probably missing something.
>
> security/keys/gc.c | 8 --------
> security/keys/key.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> security/keys/keyctl.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
This patch seems reasonable to me, though I'm still thinking about changing
fs/crypto/ to manage its key quotas itself which would avoid the issue entirely.
Note that as I said before, fs/crypto/ does key_put() on a whole keyring at
once, in order to release the quota of the keys in the keyring. Do you plan to
also change fs/crypto/ to keyring_clear() the keyring before putting it?
Without that, I don't think the problem is solved, as the quota release will
still happen asynchronously due to the keyring being cleared asynchronously.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-06 14:57 [RFC PATCH] keys: flush work when accessing /proc/key-users Luis Henriques
2023-12-06 16:04 ` David Howells
2023-12-06 17:55 ` Luis Henriques
2023-12-07 2:43 ` Eric Biggers
2023-12-11 14:02 ` David Howells
2023-12-12 3:03 ` Eric Biggers
2023-12-14 14:44 ` Luís Henriques
2024-01-15 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2] keys: update key quotas in key_put() Luis Henriques
2024-01-19 21:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-01-22 11:50 ` Luis Henriques
2024-01-22 19:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-01-24 22:12 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-01-26 16:12 ` Luis Henriques
2024-01-27 6:42 ` Eric Biggers
2024-01-29 11:23 ` Luis Henriques
2023-12-07 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH] keys: flush work when accessing /proc/key-users Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240124221225.GD1088@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome