From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, yishaih@nvidia.com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, dave.jiang@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] vfio/pci: Remove duplicate interrupt management flow
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:35:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240205153551.429d9d76.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ec901daffab4170d9740c7d066becd079925d53.1706849424.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com>
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 20:57:11 -0800
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> wrote:
> vfio_pci_set_intx_trigger() and vfio_pci_set_trigger() have the
> same flow that calls interrupt type (INTx, MSI, MSI-X) specific
> functions.
>
> Create callbacks for the interrupt type specific code that
> can be called by the shared code so that only one of these functions
> are needed. Rename the final generic function shared by all
> interrupt types vfio_pci_set_trigger().
>
> Relocate the "IOCTL support" marker to correctly mark the
> now generic code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 104 ++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> index daa84a317f40..a5b337cfae60 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx {
> };
>
> struct vfio_pci_intr_ops {
> + int (*enable)(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, unsigned int start,
> + unsigned int count, unsigned int index);
> + void (*disable)(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> + unsigned int index);
> + void (*send_eventfd)(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> + struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx);
> int (*request_interrupt)(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx,
> unsigned int vector, unsigned int index);
> @@ -356,6 +362,12 @@ static void vfio_intx_disable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> /*
> * MSI/MSI-X
> */
> +static void vfio_send_msi_eventfd(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> + struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + eventfd_signal(ctx->trigger);
> +}
> +
> static irqreturn_t vfio_msihandler(int irq, void *arg)
> {
> struct eventfd_ctx *trigger = arg;
> @@ -544,13 +556,22 @@ static void vfio_msi_unregister_producer(struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx)
> irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&ctx->producer);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * IOCTL support
> + */
> static struct vfio_pci_intr_ops intr_ops[] = {
> [VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX] = {
> + .enable = vfio_intx_enable,
> + .disable = vfio_intx_disable,
> + .send_eventfd = vfio_send_intx_eventfd_ctx,
> .request_interrupt = vfio_intx_request_interrupt,
> .free_interrupt = vfio_intx_free_interrupt,
> .device_name = vfio_intx_device_name,
> },
> [VFIO_PCI_MSI_IRQ_INDEX] = {
> + .enable = vfio_msi_enable,
> + .disable = vfio_msi_disable,
> + .send_eventfd = vfio_send_msi_eventfd,
> .request_interrupt = vfio_msi_request_interrupt,
> .free_interrupt = vfio_msi_free_interrupt,
> .device_name = vfio_msi_device_name,
> @@ -558,6 +579,9 @@ static struct vfio_pci_intr_ops intr_ops[] = {
> .unregister_producer = vfio_msi_unregister_producer,
> },
> [VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX] = {
> + .enable = vfio_msi_enable,
> + .disable = vfio_msi_disable,
> + .send_eventfd = vfio_send_msi_eventfd,
> .request_interrupt = vfio_msi_request_interrupt,
> .free_interrupt = vfio_msi_free_interrupt,
> .device_name = vfio_msi_device_name,
> @@ -646,9 +670,6 @@ static int vfio_irq_set_block(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * IOCTL support
> - */
> static int vfio_pci_set_intx_unmask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> unsigned int index, unsigned int start,
> unsigned int count, uint32_t flags,
> @@ -701,71 +722,16 @@ static int vfio_pci_set_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int vfio_pci_set_intx_trigger(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> - unsigned int index, unsigned int start,
> - unsigned int count, uint32_t flags,
> - void *data)
> -{
> - struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx;
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> - if (is_intx(vdev) && !count && (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE)) {
> - vfio_intx_disable(vdev, index);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - if (!(is_intx(vdev) || is_irq_none(vdev)))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD) {
> - int32_t *fds = data;
> - int ret;
> -
> - if (is_intx(vdev))
> - return vfio_irq_set_block(vdev, start, count, fds, index);
> -
> - ret = vfio_intx_enable(vdev, start, count, index);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = vfio_irq_set_block(vdev, start, count, fds, index);
> - if (ret)
> - vfio_intx_disable(vdev, index);
> -
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - if (!is_intx(vdev))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - /* temporary */
> - for (i = start; i < start + count; i++) {
> - ctx = vfio_irq_ctx_get(vdev, i);
> - if (!ctx || !ctx->trigger)
> - continue;
> - if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE) {
> - vfio_send_intx_eventfd_ctx(vdev, ctx);
> - } else if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_BOOL) {
> - uint8_t *bools = data;
> -
> - if (bools[i - start])
> - vfio_send_intx_eventfd_ctx(vdev, ctx);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int vfio_pci_set_msi_trigger(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> - unsigned int index, unsigned int start,
> - unsigned int count, uint32_t flags,
> - void *data)
> +static int vfio_pci_set_trigger(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> + unsigned int index, unsigned int start,
> + unsigned int count, uint32_t flags,
> + void *data)
> {
> struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx;
> unsigned int i;
>
> if (irq_is(vdev, index) && !count && (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE)) {
> - vfio_msi_disable(vdev, index);
> + intr_ops[index].disable(vdev, index);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -780,13 +746,13 @@ static int vfio_pci_set_msi_trigger(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> return vfio_irq_set_block(vdev, start, count,
> fds, index);
>
> - ret = vfio_msi_enable(vdev, start, count, index);
> + ret = intr_ops[index].enable(vdev, start, count, index);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> ret = vfio_irq_set_block(vdev, start, count, fds, index);
> if (ret)
> - vfio_msi_disable(vdev, index);
> + intr_ops[index].disable(vdev, index);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -799,11 +765,11 @@ static int vfio_pci_set_msi_trigger(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> if (!ctx || !ctx->trigger)
> continue;
> if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE) {
> - eventfd_signal(ctx->trigger);
> + intr_ops[index].send_eventfd(vdev, ctx);
> } else if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_BOOL) {
> uint8_t *bools = data;
Nit, an opportunity to add the missing new line between variable
declaration and code here. Thanks,
Alex
> if (bools[i - start])
> - eventfd_signal(ctx->trigger);
> + intr_ops[index].send_eventfd(vdev, ctx);
> }
> }
> return 0;
> @@ -912,7 +878,7 @@ int vfio_pci_set_irqs_ioctl(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, uint32_t flags,
> func = vfio_pci_set_intx_unmask;
> break;
> case VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER:
> - func = vfio_pci_set_intx_trigger;
> + func = vfio_pci_set_trigger;
> break;
> }
> break;
> @@ -924,7 +890,7 @@ int vfio_pci_set_irqs_ioctl(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, uint32_t flags,
> /* XXX Need masking support exported */
> break;
> case VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER:
> - func = vfio_pci_set_msi_trigger;
> + func = vfio_pci_set_trigger;
> break;
> }
> break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-05 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 4:56 [PATCH 00/17] vfio/pci: Remove duplicate code and logic from VFIO PCI interrupt management Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:56 ` [PATCH 01/17] vfio/pci: Use unsigned int instead of unsigned Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:56 ` [PATCH 02/17] vfio/pci: Remove duplicate check from vfio_pci_set_ctx_trigger_single() wrappers Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:56 ` [PATCH 03/17] vfio/pci: Consistently acquire mutex for interrupt management Reinette Chatre
2024-02-05 22:34 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-06 21:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:56 ` [PATCH 04/17] vfio/pci: Remove duplicate interrupt management from core VFIO PCI Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:56 ` [PATCH 05/17] vfio/pci: Limit eventfd signaling to interrupt management code Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 06/17] vfio/pci: Remove interrupt index interpretation from wrappers Reinette Chatre
2024-02-05 22:35 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-06 21:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 07/17] vfio/pci: Preserve per-interrupt contexts Reinette Chatre
2024-02-05 22:35 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-06 21:45 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-02-06 22:03 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-06 22:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 08/17] vfio/pci: Extract MSI/MSI-X specific code from common flow Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 09/17] vfio/pci: Converge similar code flows Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 10/17] vfio/pci: Extract INTx specific code from vfio_intx_set_signal() Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 11/17] vfio/pci: Perform MSI/MSI-X interrupt management via callbacks Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 12/17] vfio/pci: Remove msi term from generic code Reinette Chatre
2024-02-05 22:35 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-06 21:45 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 13/17] vfio/pci: Remove vfio_intx_set_signal() Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 14/17] vfio/pci: Add utility to trigger INTx eventfd knowing interrupt context Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 15/17] vfio/pci: Let enable and disable of interrupt types use same signature Reinette Chatre
2024-02-05 22:35 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-06 21:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-02-06 22:03 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-06 22:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-02-06 23:19 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-07 23:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-02-08 21:08 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-14 19:37 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 16/17] vfio/pci: Move vfio_msi_disable() to be with other MSI/MSI-X management code Reinette Chatre
2024-02-02 4:57 ` [PATCH 17/17] vfio/pci: Remove duplicate interrupt management flow Reinette Chatre
2024-02-05 22:35 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2024-02-06 21:46 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240205153551.429d9d76.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome