mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Pin benchmark to single CPU
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 03:04:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402060302.C9BD99F@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcIG8y0U1VyMsCAD@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>

On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 10:16:19AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:56:47AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> > +	/* Set from highest CPU down. */
> > +	for (cpu = ncores - 1; cpu >= 0; cpu--) {
> > +		CPU_ZERO_S(setsz, setp);
> > +		CPU_SET_S(cpu, setsz, setp);
> 
> Is there some particular reason to go from the highest CPU number down?
> Not that it super matters but the default would be to iterate from 0 and
> there's a comment but it just says the what not the why.

I was arbitrarily picking a direction and all the examples I could find
started at 0, so this would be more (?) out of the way. :P

Without a cpu cgroup, I can't _exclude_ the pinned CPU from other
processes, so I was pretending the last CPU will be less likely to be
used.

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-06  9:56 Kees Cook
2024-02-06 10:16 ` Mark Brown
2024-02-06 11:04   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-02-06 11:10     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202402060302.C9BD99F@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®