mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: alexs@kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yangyicong@hisilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] sched/fair: Rework sched_use_asym_prio() and sched_asym_prefer()
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 18:47:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240209024737.GA10494@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240207034704.935774-3-alexs@kernel.org>

On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:47:03AM +0800, alexs@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
> 
> sched_use_asym_prio() sched_asym_prefer() are used together in various

s/prio() sched/prio() and sched/

> places. Consolidate them into a single function sched_asym().
> 
> The existing sched_group_asym() is only used when collecting statistics
> of a scheduling group. Rename it as sched_group_asym().
> This makes the code easier to read. No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
> To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
> To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 607dc310b355..942b6358f683 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9746,8 +9746,18 @@ static bool sched_use_asym_prio(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
>  	return sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY || is_core_idle(cpu);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool sched_asym(struct sched_domain *sd, int dst_cpu, int src_cpu)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * First check if @dst_cpu can do asym_packing load balance. Only do it
> +	 * if it has higher priority than @src_cpu.
> +	 */
> +	return sched_use_asym_prio(sd, dst_cpu) &&
> +		sched_asym_prefer(dst_cpu, src_cpu);
> +}
> +
>  /**
> - * sched_asym - Check if the destination CPU can do asym_packing load balance
> + * sched_group_asym - Check if the destination CPU can do asym_packing balance
>   * @env:	The load balancing environment
>   * @sgs:	Load-balancing statistics of the candidate busiest group
>   * @group:	The candidate busiest group

After renaming and changing this function now its documentation has become
obsolete. Can you update it?
 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-09  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-07  3:47 [PATCH v4 1/4] sched/topology: Remove duplicate descriptions from TOPOLOGY_SD_FLAGS alexs
2024-02-07  3:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] sched/fair: remove unused parameters alexs
2024-02-07 16:22   ` Ricardo Neri
2024-02-08 15:18   ` Valentin Schneider
2024-02-07  3:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] sched/fair: Rework sched_use_asym_prio() and sched_asym_prefer() alexs
2024-02-09  2:47   ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2024-02-09 11:08     ` kuiliang Shi
2024-02-10  1:16       ` Ricardo Neri
2024-02-07  3:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] sched/fair: Check the SD_ASYM_PACKING flag in sched_use_asym_prio() alexs
2024-02-07  3:58   ` [PATCH v4 5/5] sched: rename SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES to SD_SHARE_LLC alexs
2024-02-08 15:18     ` Valentin Schneider
2024-02-09  3:00     ` Ricardo Neri
2024-02-09 11:12   ` [PATCH v4 4/4] sched/fair: Check the SD_ASYM_PACKING flag in sched_use_asym_prio() kuiliang Shi
2024-02-09 13:28     ` Ricardo Neri
2024-02-10  1:12   ` Ricardo Neri
2024-02-10 11:08     ` Alex Shi
2024-02-07 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] sched/topology: Remove duplicate descriptions from TOPOLOGY_SD_FLAGS Ricardo Neri
2024-02-08 15:18 ` Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240209024737.GA10494@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com \
    --to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexs@kernel.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®