From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
antonio.gomez.iglesias@linux.intel.com,
alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Default retbleed to =stuff when retpoline is auto enabled
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:56:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240209185625.hca6lts6dv4cd3fu@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240208-retbleed-auto-stuff-v1-1-6f12e513868f@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:12:15PM -0800, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> @@ -1025,10 +1041,17 @@ static void __init retbleed_select_mitigation(void)
> retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_UNRET;
> else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_IBPB_ENTRY) && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))
> retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_IBPB;
> + } else if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
> + spectre_v2_parse_cmdline() == SPECTRE_V2_CMD_AUTO &&
spectre_v2_parse_cmdline() has side effects (printks) and shouldn't be
called twice.
And what's the point of checking spectre_v2= anyway? Shouldn't retbleed
be mitigated by default, independently of whatever the user may have
specified for Spectre v2?
> + spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_RETPOLINE) {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING))
> + retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_STUFF;
> + else
> + pr_err("WARNING: Retpoline enabled, but kernel not compiled with CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING.\n");
If retbleed is vulnerable then the sysfs file should show that.
Also, I think this pr_err() is redundant with RETBLEED_INTEL_MSG and can
be removed.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-09 1:12 Pawan Gupta
2024-02-09 18:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2024-02-09 20:33 ` Pawan Gupta
2024-02-10 0:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-02-13 0:02 ` Pawan Gupta
2024-02-10 0:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-02-10 2:39 ` Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240209185625.hca6lts6dv4cd3fu@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=alyssa.milburn@intel.com \
--cc=alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=antonio.gomez.iglesias@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®