mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
	antonio.gomez.iglesias@linux.intel.com,
	alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Default retbleed to =stuff when retpoline is auto enabled
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:56:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240209185625.hca6lts6dv4cd3fu@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240208-retbleed-auto-stuff-v1-1-6f12e513868f@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:12:15PM -0800, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> @@ -1025,10 +1041,17 @@ static void __init retbleed_select_mitigation(void)
>  				retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_UNRET;
>  			else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_IBPB_ENTRY) && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))
>  				retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_IBPB;
> +		} else if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
> +			   spectre_v2_parse_cmdline() == SPECTRE_V2_CMD_AUTO &&

spectre_v2_parse_cmdline() has side effects (printks) and shouldn't be
called twice.

And what's the point of checking spectre_v2= anyway?  Shouldn't retbleed
be mitigated by default, independently of whatever the user may have
specified for Spectre v2?

> +			   spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_RETPOLINE) {
> +			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING))
> +				retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_STUFF;
> +			else
> +				pr_err("WARNING: Retpoline enabled, but kernel not compiled with CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING.\n");

If retbleed is vulnerable then the sysfs file should show that.

Also, I think this pr_err() is redundant with RETBLEED_INTEL_MSG and can
be removed.

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-09 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-09  1:12 Pawan Gupta
2024-02-09 18:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2024-02-09 20:33   ` Pawan Gupta
2024-02-10  0:40     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-02-13  0:02     ` Pawan Gupta
2024-02-10  0:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-02-10  2:39   ` Pawan Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240209185625.hca6lts6dv4cd3fu@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=alyssa.milburn@intel.com \
    --cc=alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=antonio.gomez.iglesias@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®