mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: "Alexander Lobakin" <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
	"Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] page_pool: disable direct recycling based on pool->cpuid on destroy
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:39:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240215113905.96817-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> (raw)

Now that direct recycling is performed basing on pool->cpuid when set,
memory leaks are possible:

1. A pool is destroyed.
2. Alloc cache is emptied (it's done only once).
3. pool->cpuid is still set.
4. napi_pp_put_page() does direct recycling basing on pool->cpuid.
5. Now alloc cache is not empty, but it won't ever be freed.

In order to avoid that, rewrite pool->cpuid to -1 when unlinking NAPI to
make sure no direct recycling will be possible after emptying the cache.
This involves a bit of overhead as pool->cpuid now must be accessed
via READ_ONCE() to avoid partial reads.
Rename page_pool_unlink_napi() -> page_pool_disable_direct_recycling()
to reflect what it actually does and unexport it.

Fixes: 2b0cfa6e4956 ("net: add generic percpu page_pool allocator")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
---
 include/net/page_pool/types.h |  5 -----
 net/core/page_pool.c          | 10 +++++++---
 net/core/skbuff.c             |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/types.h b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
index 3828396ae60c..3590fbe6e3f1 100644
--- a/include/net/page_pool/types.h
+++ b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
@@ -210,17 +210,12 @@ struct page_pool *page_pool_create_percpu(const struct page_pool_params *params,
 struct xdp_mem_info;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL
-void page_pool_unlink_napi(struct page_pool *pool);
 void page_pool_destroy(struct page_pool *pool);
 void page_pool_use_xdp_mem(struct page_pool *pool, void (*disconnect)(void *),
 			   struct xdp_mem_info *mem);
 void page_pool_put_page_bulk(struct page_pool *pool, void **data,
 			     int count);
 #else
-static inline void page_pool_unlink_napi(struct page_pool *pool)
-{
-}
-
 static inline void page_pool_destroy(struct page_pool *pool)
 {
 }
diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
index 89c835fcf094..e8b9399d8e32 100644
--- a/net/core/page_pool.c
+++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
@@ -949,8 +949,13 @@ void page_pool_use_xdp_mem(struct page_pool *pool, void (*disconnect)(void *),
 	pool->xdp_mem_id = mem->id;
 }
 
-void page_pool_unlink_napi(struct page_pool *pool)
+static void page_pool_disable_direct_recycling(struct page_pool *pool)
 {
+	/* Disable direct recycling based on pool->cpuid.
+	 * Paired with READ_ONCE() in napi_pp_put_page().
+	 */
+	WRITE_ONCE(pool->cpuid, -1);
+
 	if (!pool->p.napi)
 		return;
 
@@ -962,7 +967,6 @@ void page_pool_unlink_napi(struct page_pool *pool)
 
 	WRITE_ONCE(pool->p.napi, NULL);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_unlink_napi);
 
 void page_pool_destroy(struct page_pool *pool)
 {
@@ -972,7 +976,7 @@ void page_pool_destroy(struct page_pool *pool)
 	if (!page_pool_put(pool))
 		return;
 
-	page_pool_unlink_napi(pool);
+	page_pool_disable_direct_recycling(pool);
 	page_pool_free_frag(pool);
 
 	if (!page_pool_release(pool))
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 0d9a489e6ae1..b41856585c24 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ bool napi_pp_put_page(struct page *page, bool napi_safe)
 		unsigned int cpuid = smp_processor_id();
 
 		allow_direct = napi && READ_ONCE(napi->list_owner) == cpuid;
-		allow_direct |= (pp->cpuid == cpuid);
+		allow_direct |= READ_ONCE(pp->cpuid) == cpuid;
 	}
 
 	/* Driver set this to memory recycling info. Reset it on recycle.
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-15 11:39 Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2024-02-15 11:57 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-02-15 12:05 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-02-15 13:12   ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-02-15 13:29     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-02-15 13:37     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-02-15 13:45       ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-02-15 14:01         ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-02-16 17:47 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-02-19 20:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240215113905.96817-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®