From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 238907869A; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708089185; cv=none; b=swTmDZRqkcV9o07xxGUadmobnCA24BpKVtDbbDauhlBFq7U7x0v51GofwPMF+N+bt8LTjTUiteJl+zVLdejHKLc4HZ4i2qABNrGlI94WelVlRWDrA3+Gx6T3GYAe6rT2wnhrGa2wLHzvAdmZ43oZ64fIE98zjDqvoTNQHMvcBPs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708089185; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w7PxYeL2YJi5lLDMuxgVxDRatSZggnbIIYFFi/StyVM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rqjVew5IFDNVP5NQn31cOn71skeiHDxChDXH1O+It5hVc2k66oEx+p6k43fkXspmEou4IF1cMwm5ReRz9Us4ef49uQ0M0r019c3/dPasgU9HgxVWaDS2uHFuIzQ62I3Qk7IDj+aiF34ku+C1QnghF9GfzuIH2mq7Mjn92BpxgwI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=GS5BaKqN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="GS5BaKqN" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708089183; x=1739625183; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=w7PxYeL2YJi5lLDMuxgVxDRatSZggnbIIYFFi/StyVM=; b=GS5BaKqNgsQIZ3t5w+TgaKFsz651czMeXfIT6oy62qz1QijaP3uG9a/3 VxM8uM8zfL6nHDFhw1M24m7DdsHTPkhHQeIm1n63y+DZdqMl6Hxq7InUW EFsAWI96wnhMrMzgWRH+vSLOsL2VRDimknejCPqMkFAHlVkCVNXhPmfu5 t23qNgPfOlsUY1rPF+wmf5gbnlyD8ORBXzErLvKaDB6jVj1x3CGL2YGTK JtdVCpb8ZeWCI6bunxtbAa5oNpBTn5k2sNiB+1C+Q885pamSchC4CIRFL WWE7Df8uAjbYvMTruSqqX07hXei2iR+WGyItGn1q75vQeV7UW2kZ6/TTt Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10985"; a="2083623" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,164,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="2083623" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2024 05:13:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,164,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="3801537" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 3c78fa4d504c) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2024 05:12:58 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 3c78fa4d504c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ray1N-0001IA-17; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:12:54 +0000 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 21:12:06 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Raphael Gallais-Pou , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Yannick Fertre , Philippe Cornu , Philipp Zabel Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Raphael Gallais-Pou Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/stm: lvds: add new STM32 LVDS Display Interface Transmitter driver Message-ID: <202402162038.HP7VzIHX-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240206-lvds-v5-2-bd16797b0f09@foss.st.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240206-lvds-v5-2-bd16797b0f09@foss.st.com> Hi Raphael, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on bb3bc3eac316b7c388733e625cc2343131b69dee] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Raphael-Gallais-Pou/dt-bindings-display-add-STM32-LVDS-device/20240206-194740 base: bb3bc3eac316b7c388733e625cc2343131b69dee patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240206-lvds-v5-2-bd16797b0f09%40foss.st.com patch subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/stm: lvds: add new STM32 LVDS Display Interface Transmitter driver config: arm-randconfig-r132-20240214 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240216/202402162038.HP7VzIHX-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a) reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240216/202402162038.HP7VzIHX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402162038.HP7VzIHX-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/gpu/drm/stm/lvds.c:318:17: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lvds_bitmap_jeida_rgb888' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/gpu/drm/stm/lvds.c:335:17: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lvds_bitmap_vesa_rgb888' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/stm/lvds.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/mmzone.h, include/linux/gfp.h, include/linux/stackdepot.h, ...): include/linux/page-flags.h:242:46: sparse: sparse: self-comparison always evaluates to false vim +/lvds_bitmap_jeida_rgb888 +318 drivers/gpu/drm/stm/lvds.c 308 309 /* 310 * Expected JEIDA-RGB888 data to be sent in LSB format 311 * bit6 ............................bit0 312 * CHAN0 {ONE, ONE, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, ONE, ONE} 313 * CHAN1 {G2, R7, R6, R5, R4, R3, R2} 314 * CHAN2 {B3, B2, G7, G6, G5, G4, G3} 315 * CHAN3 {DE, VS, HS, B7, B6, B5, B4} 316 * CHAN4 {CE, B1, B0, G1, G0, R1, R0} 317 */ > 318 enum lvds_pixel lvds_bitmap_jeida_rgb888[5][7] = { 319 { PIX_ONE, PIX_ONE, PIX_ZER, PIX_ZER, PIX_ZER, PIX_ONE, PIX_ONE }, 320 { PIX_G_2, PIX_R_7, PIX_R_6, PIX_R_5, PIX_R_4, PIX_R_3, PIX_R_2 }, 321 { PIX_B_3, PIX_B_2, PIX_G_7, PIX_G_6, PIX_G_5, PIX_G_4, PIX_G_3 }, 322 { PIX_D_E, PIX_V_S, PIX_H_S, PIX_B_7, PIX_B_6, PIX_B_5, PIX_B_4 }, 323 { PIX_C_E, PIX_B_1, PIX_B_0, PIX_G_1, PIX_G_0, PIX_R_1, PIX_R_0 } 324 }; 325 326 /* 327 * Expected VESA-RGB888 data to be sent in LSB format 328 * bit6 ............................bit0 329 * CHAN0 {ONE, ONE, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, ONE, ONE} 330 * CHAN1 {G0, R5, R4, R3, R2, R1, R0} 331 * CHAN2 {B1, B0, G5, G4, G3, G2, G1} 332 * CHAN3 {DE, VS, HS, B5, B4, B3, B2} 333 * CHAN4 {CE, B7, B6, G7, G6, R7, R6} 334 */ > 335 enum lvds_pixel lvds_bitmap_vesa_rgb888[5][7] = { 336 { PIX_ONE, PIX_ONE, PIX_ZER, PIX_ZER, PIX_ZER, PIX_ONE, PIX_ONE }, 337 { PIX_G_0, PIX_R_5, PIX_R_4, PIX_R_3, PIX_R_2, PIX_R_1, PIX_R_0 }, 338 { PIX_B_1, PIX_B_0, PIX_G_5, PIX_G_4, PIX_G_3, PIX_G_2, PIX_G_1 }, 339 { PIX_D_E, PIX_V_S, PIX_H_S, PIX_B_5, PIX_B_4, PIX_B_3, PIX_B_2 }, 340 { PIX_C_E, PIX_B_7, PIX_B_6, PIX_G_7, PIX_G_6, PIX_R_7, PIX_R_6 } 341 }; 342 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki