From: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
To: <andersson@kernel.org>, <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
<conor+dt@kernel.org>, <michal.simek@amd.com>,
<ben.levinsky@amd.com>, <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v11 4/4] remoteproc: zynqmp: parse TCM from device tree
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:44:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240219174437.3722620-5-tanmay.shah@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240219174437.3722620-1-tanmay.shah@amd.com>
ZynqMP TCM information was fixed in driver. Now ZynqMP TCM information
is available in device-tree. Parse TCM information in driver
as per new bindings.
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
---
Changes in v11:
- Remove redundant initialization of the variable
- return correct error code if memory allocation failed
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
index 42b0384d34f2..d4a22caebaad 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ struct mbox_info {
};
/*
- * Hardcoded TCM bank values. This will be removed once TCM bindings are
- * accepted for system-dt specifications and upstreamed in linux kernel
+ * Hardcoded TCM bank values. This will stay in driver to maintain backward
+ * compatibility with device-tree that does not have TCM information.
*/
static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks_split[] = {
{0xffe00000UL, 0x0, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
@@ -757,6 +757,103 @@ static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
+static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
+{
+ int i, j, tcm_bank_count, ret, tcm_pd_idx, pd_count;
+ struct of_phandle_args out_args;
+ struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
+ struct platform_device *cpdev;
+ struct mem_bank_data *tcm;
+ struct device_node *np;
+ struct resource *res;
+ u64 abs_addr, size;
+ struct device *dev;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
+ r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
+ dev = r5_core->dev;
+ np = r5_core->np;
+
+ pd_count = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains",
+ "#power-domain-cells");
+
+ if (pd_count <= 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "invalid power-domains property, %d\n", pd_count);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* First entry in power-domains list is for r5 core, rest for TCM. */
+ tcm_bank_count = pd_count - 1;
+
+ if (tcm_bank_count <= 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "invalid TCM count %d\n", tcm_bank_count);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
+ sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
+ for (j = 0, tcm_pd_idx = 1; j < tcm_bank_count; j++, tcm_pd_idx++) {
+ tcm = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct mem_bank_data),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tcm)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ r5_core->tcm_banks[j] = tcm;
+
+ /* Get power-domains id of TCM. */
+ ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains",
+ "#power-domain-cells",
+ tcm_pd_idx, &out_args);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(r5_core->dev,
+ "failed to get tcm %d pm domain, ret %d\n",
+ tcm_pd_idx, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ tcm->pm_domain_id = out_args.args[0];
+ of_node_put(out_args.np);
+
+ /* Get TCM address without translation. */
+ ret = of_property_read_reg(np, j, &abs_addr, &size);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to get reg property\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Remote processor can address only 32 bits
+ * so convert 64-bits into 32-bits. This will discard
+ * any unwanted upper 32-bits.
+ */
+ tcm->da = (u32)abs_addr;
+ tcm->size = (u32)size;
+
+ cpdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+ res = platform_get_resource(cpdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, j);
+ if (!res) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to get tcm resource\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ tcm->addr = (u32)res->start;
+ tcm->bank_name = (char *)res->name;
+ res = devm_request_mem_region(dev, tcm->addr, tcm->size,
+ tcm->bank_name);
+ if (!res) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to request tcm resource\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
* Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
@@ -835,9 +932,14 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
int ret, i;
- ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
+ r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[0];
+ if (of_find_property(r5_core->np, "reg", NULL))
+ ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(cluster);
+ else
+ ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
+
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm, err %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-19 17:44 [PATCH v11 0/4] add zynqmp TCM bindings Tanmay Shah
2024-02-19 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] remoteproc: zynqmp: fix lockstep mode memory region Tanmay Shah
2024-02-19 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings Tanmay Shah
2024-02-28 19:20 ` Tanmay Shah
2024-02-29 9:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-02-29 23:45 ` Tanmay Shah
2024-02-19 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] dts: zynqmp: add properties for TCM in remoteproc Tanmay Shah
2024-02-19 17:44 ` Tanmay Shah [this message]
2024-02-19 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 0/4] add zynqmp TCM bindings Tanmay Shah
2024-02-19 17:55 ` Tanmay Shah
2024-02-19 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] remoteproc: zynqmp: fix lockstep mode memory region Tanmay Shah
2024-02-28 17:08 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-02-28 19:24 ` Tanmay Shah
2024-02-28 20:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-02-19 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings Tanmay Shah
2024-02-19 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] dts: zynqmp: add properties for TCM in remoteproc Tanmay Shah
2024-02-19 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] remoteproc: zynqmp: parse TCM from device tree Tanmay Shah
2024-02-28 17:06 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-02-28 17:12 ` Tanmay Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240219174437.3722620-5-tanmay.shah@amd.com \
--to=tanmay.shah@amd.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=ben.levinsky@amd.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®