From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,pbonzini@redhat.com,tglx@linutronix.de,x86@kernel.org,bp@alien8.de,Dave
Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 11/34] x86/cpu/intel: Prepare MKTME for "address configuration" infrastructure
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:39:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222183941.7CB634A5@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222183926.517AFCD2@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com>
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Intel also does memory encryption and also fiddles with the physical
address bits. This is currently called for *each* CPU, but practically
only done on the boot CPU because of 'mktme_status'.
Move it from the "each CPU" ->c_init() function to ->c_bsp_init() where
the whole thing only gets called once ever. This also necessitates moving
detect_tme() and its entourage around in the file.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
---
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c~intel-move-TME-detection arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c~intel-move-TME-detection 2024-02-22 10:08:53.820663775 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c 2024-02-22 10:08:53.824663932 -0800
@@ -324,9 +324,96 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpui
detect_ht_early(c);
}
+#define MSR_IA32_TME_ACTIVATE 0x982
+
+/* Helpers to access TME_ACTIVATE MSR */
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_LOCKED(x) (x & 0x1)
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_ENABLED(x) (x & 0x2)
+
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY(x) ((x >> 4) & 0xf) /* Bits 7:4 */
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY_AES_XTS_128 0
+
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_KEYID_BITS(x) ((x >> 32) & 0xf) /* Bits 35:32 */
+
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_ALGS(x) ((x >> 48) & 0xffff) /* Bits 63:48 */
+#define TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_AES_XTS_128 1
+
+/* Values for mktme_status (SW only construct) */
+#define MKTME_ENABLED 0
+#define MKTME_DISABLED 1
+#define MKTME_UNINITIALIZED 2
+static int mktme_status = MKTME_UNINITIALIZED;
+
+static void detect_tme(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+ u64 tme_activate, tme_policy, tme_crypto_algs;
+ int keyid_bits = 0, nr_keyids = 0;
+ static u64 tme_activate_cpu0 = 0;
+
+ rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_TME_ACTIVATE, tme_activate);
+
+ if (mktme_status != MKTME_UNINITIALIZED) {
+ if (tme_activate != tme_activate_cpu0) {
+ /* Broken BIOS? */
+ pr_err_once("x86/tme: configuration is inconsistent between CPUs\n");
+ pr_err_once("x86/tme: MKTME is not usable\n");
+ mktme_status = MKTME_DISABLED;
+
+ /* Proceed. We may need to exclude bits from x86_phys_bits. */
+ }
+ } else {
+ tme_activate_cpu0 = tme_activate;
+ }
+
+ if (!TME_ACTIVATE_LOCKED(tme_activate) || !TME_ACTIVATE_ENABLED(tme_activate)) {
+ pr_info_once("x86/tme: not enabled by BIOS\n");
+ mktme_status = MKTME_DISABLED;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (mktme_status != MKTME_UNINITIALIZED)
+ goto detect_keyid_bits;
+
+ pr_info("x86/tme: enabled by BIOS\n");
+
+ tme_policy = TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY(tme_activate);
+ if (tme_policy != TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY_AES_XTS_128)
+ pr_warn("x86/tme: Unknown policy is active: %#llx\n", tme_policy);
+
+ tme_crypto_algs = TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_ALGS(tme_activate);
+ if (!(tme_crypto_algs & TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_AES_XTS_128)) {
+ pr_err("x86/mktme: No known encryption algorithm is supported: %#llx\n",
+ tme_crypto_algs);
+ mktme_status = MKTME_DISABLED;
+ }
+detect_keyid_bits:
+ keyid_bits = TME_ACTIVATE_KEYID_BITS(tme_activate);
+ nr_keyids = (1UL << keyid_bits) - 1;
+ if (nr_keyids) {
+ pr_info_once("x86/mktme: enabled by BIOS\n");
+ pr_info_once("x86/mktme: %d KeyIDs available\n", nr_keyids);
+ } else {
+ pr_info_once("x86/mktme: disabled by BIOS\n");
+ }
+
+ if (mktme_status == MKTME_UNINITIALIZED) {
+ /* MKTME is usable */
+ mktme_status = MKTME_ENABLED;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * KeyID bits effectively lower the number of physical address
+ * bits. Update cpuinfo_x86::x86_phys_bits accordingly.
+ */
+ c->x86_phys_bits -= keyid_bits;
+}
+
static void bsp_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
resctrl_cpu_detect(c);
+
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TME))
+ detect_tme(c);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
@@ -482,90 +569,6 @@ static void srat_detect_node(struct cpui
#endif
}
-#define MSR_IA32_TME_ACTIVATE 0x982
-
-/* Helpers to access TME_ACTIVATE MSR */
-#define TME_ACTIVATE_LOCKED(x) (x & 0x1)
-#define TME_ACTIVATE_ENABLED(x) (x & 0x2)
-
-#define TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY(x) ((x >> 4) & 0xf) /* Bits 7:4 */
-#define TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY_AES_XTS_128 0
-
-#define TME_ACTIVATE_KEYID_BITS(x) ((x >> 32) & 0xf) /* Bits 35:32 */
-
-#define TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_ALGS(x) ((x >> 48) & 0xffff) /* Bits 63:48 */
-#define TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_AES_XTS_128 1
-
-/* Values for mktme_status (SW only construct) */
-#define MKTME_ENABLED 0
-#define MKTME_DISABLED 1
-#define MKTME_UNINITIALIZED 2
-static int mktme_status = MKTME_UNINITIALIZED;
-
-static void detect_tme(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
-{
- u64 tme_activate, tme_policy, tme_crypto_algs;
- int keyid_bits = 0, nr_keyids = 0;
- static u64 tme_activate_cpu0 = 0;
-
- rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_TME_ACTIVATE, tme_activate);
-
- if (mktme_status != MKTME_UNINITIALIZED) {
- if (tme_activate != tme_activate_cpu0) {
- /* Broken BIOS? */
- pr_err_once("x86/tme: configuration is inconsistent between CPUs\n");
- pr_err_once("x86/tme: MKTME is not usable\n");
- mktme_status = MKTME_DISABLED;
-
- /* Proceed. We may need to exclude bits from x86_phys_bits. */
- }
- } else {
- tme_activate_cpu0 = tme_activate;
- }
-
- if (!TME_ACTIVATE_LOCKED(tme_activate) || !TME_ACTIVATE_ENABLED(tme_activate)) {
- pr_info_once("x86/tme: not enabled by BIOS\n");
- mktme_status = MKTME_DISABLED;
- return;
- }
-
- if (mktme_status != MKTME_UNINITIALIZED)
- goto detect_keyid_bits;
-
- pr_info("x86/tme: enabled by BIOS\n");
-
- tme_policy = TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY(tme_activate);
- if (tme_policy != TME_ACTIVATE_POLICY_AES_XTS_128)
- pr_warn("x86/tme: Unknown policy is active: %#llx\n", tme_policy);
-
- tme_crypto_algs = TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_ALGS(tme_activate);
- if (!(tme_crypto_algs & TME_ACTIVATE_CRYPTO_AES_XTS_128)) {
- pr_err("x86/mktme: No known encryption algorithm is supported: %#llx\n",
- tme_crypto_algs);
- mktme_status = MKTME_DISABLED;
- }
-detect_keyid_bits:
- keyid_bits = TME_ACTIVATE_KEYID_BITS(tme_activate);
- nr_keyids = (1UL << keyid_bits) - 1;
- if (nr_keyids) {
- pr_info_once("x86/mktme: enabled by BIOS\n");
- pr_info_once("x86/mktme: %d KeyIDs available\n", nr_keyids);
- } else {
- pr_info_once("x86/mktme: disabled by BIOS\n");
- }
-
- if (mktme_status == MKTME_UNINITIALIZED) {
- /* MKTME is usable */
- mktme_status = MKTME_ENABLED;
- }
-
- /*
- * KeyID bits effectively lower the number of physical address
- * bits. Update cpuinfo_x86::x86_phys_bits accordingly.
- */
- c->x86_phys_bits -= keyid_bits;
-}
-
static void init_cpuid_fault(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
u64 msr;
@@ -702,9 +705,6 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x8
init_ia32_feat_ctl(c);
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TME))
- detect_tme(c);
-
init_intel_misc_features(c);
split_lock_init();
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 18:39 [RFC][PATCH 00/34] [RFC] x86: Rework system-wide configuration masquerading as per-cpu data Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/34] x86/xen: Explain why calling get_cpu_cap() so early is a hack Dave Hansen
2024-03-07 16:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/34] x86/xen: Remove early "debug" physical address lookups Dave Hansen
2024-03-07 17:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-03-11 13:16 ` Jürgen Groß
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/34] x86/pci: Assume that clflush size is always provided Dave Hansen
2024-03-08 8:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/34] x86/mm: Introduce physical address limit helper Dave Hansen
2024-02-27 11:05 ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/34] x86/cpu: Move /proc per-cpu ->x86_phys_bits reference to global one Dave Hansen
2024-02-27 11:05 ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/34] x86/boot: Use consistent value for iomem_resource.end Dave Hansen
2024-02-27 10:59 ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-28 14:22 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/34] x86/mm: Introduce virtual address space limit helper Dave Hansen
2024-02-27 11:09 ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/34] x86/cpu: Add CLFLUSH size helper Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/34] x86/cpu: Introduce address configuration structure Dave Hansen
2024-02-27 23:47 ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-28 17:29 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/34] x86/cpu/amd: Use new "address configuration" infrastructure Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2024-02-23 11:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/34] x86/cpu/intel: Prepare MKTME for " Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-23 16:22 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-26 12:14 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-27 21:48 ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-28 15:20 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-28 16:57 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/34] x86/cpu/intel: Actually use "address configuration" infrastructure for MKTME Dave Hansen
2024-02-23 11:41 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-23 16:16 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/34] x86/boot: Use address reduction config to handle erratum Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/34] x86/cpu: Remove default physical address space settings Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 15/34] x86/cpu: Remove default x86_phys_bits assignment Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/34] x86/cpu: Move physical address limit out of cpuinfo_x86 Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 17/34] x86/cpu: Move virtual " Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 18/34] x86/cpu/centaur: Move cache alignment override to BSP init Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 19/34] x86/cpu: Introduce cache alignment multiplier Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 20/34] x86/cpu: Remove superfluous cache alignment assignments Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 21/34] x86/cpu: Consolidate CLFLUSH size setting Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 22/34] x86/cpu: Move CLFLUSH size into global config Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 23/34] x86/cpu: Move cache alignment configuration to global struct Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 24/34] x86/cpu: Establish 'min_cache_bits' configuration Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 25/34] x86/cpu: Move cache bits to global config Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 26/34] x86/cpu: Zap superfluous get_cpu_address_sizes() Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 27/34] x86/cpu: Enforce read-only x86_config state (lightly) Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 28/34] x86/cpu: Return sane defaults for early x86_config reads Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 29/34] x86/xen: Remove extra get_cpu_address_sizes() call Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 30/34] x86/cpu/centaur: Mark BSP init function as __init Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 31/34] x86/cpu/intel: " Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 32/34] x86/cpu/amd: Move memory encryption detection Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 33/34] x86/cpu: Make get_cpu_address_sizes() static and __init Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 34/34] x86/cpu: Mark new boot CPU and config structures appropriately Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240222183941.7CB634A5@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®