From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: irq: unconditionally define KVM interrupt vectors
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 05:22:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240223102229.627664-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
Unlike arch/x86/kernel/idt.c, FRED support chose to remove the #ifdefs
from the .c files and concentrate them in the headers, where unused
handlers are #define'd to NULL.
However, the constants for KVM's 3 posted interrupt vectors are still
defined conditionally in irq_vectors.h. In the tree that FRED support was
developed on, this is innocuous because CONFIG_HAVE_KVM was effectively
always set. With the cleanups that recently went into the KVM tree to
remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM, the conditional became IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM).
This causes a linux-next compilation failure in FRED code, when
CONFIG_KVM=n.
In preparation for the merging of FRED in Linux 6.9, define the interrupt
vector numbers unconditionally.
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Suggested-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@zytor.com>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
index 3f73ac3ed3a0..d18bfb238f66 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
@@ -84,11 +84,9 @@
#define HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR 0xf3
/* Vector for KVM to deliver posted interrupt IPI */
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
#define POSTED_INTR_VECTOR 0xf2
#define POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR 0xf1
#define POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR 0xf0
-#endif
#define MANAGED_IRQ_SHUTDOWN_VECTOR 0xef
--
2.39.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-23 10:22 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2024-02-23 18:49 ` Xin Li
2024-02-26 15:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240223102229.627664-1-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®