mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
To: Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com
Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Do not use readl() for policy buffer access
Date: Mon,  4 Mar 2024 21:50:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240304205005.10078-3-W_Armin@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304205005.10078-1-W_Armin@gmx.de>

The policy buffer is allocated using normal memory allocation
functions, so readl() should not be used on it.

Compile-tested only.

Fixes: 7c45534afa44 ("platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF Policy Binary")
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 13dd4462e1e3..58ec2c9606e1 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 	u32 cookie, length;
 	int res;

-	cookie = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
-	length = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);
+	cookie = *(u32 *)(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
+	length = *(u32 *)(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);

 	if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length)
 		return -EINVAL;
--
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-04 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04 20:50 [PATCH v3 0/4] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fix policy binary handling Armin Wolf
2024-03-04 20:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fix return value of amd_pmf_start_policy_engine() Armin Wolf
2024-03-04 20:50 ` Armin Wolf [this message]
2024-03-04 20:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Use struct for cookie header Armin Wolf
2024-03-04 20:50 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fix possible out-of-bound memory accesses Armin Wolf
2024-03-06  5:09 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fix policy binary handling Shyam Sundar S K
2024-03-06  9:53   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-03-06 10:50 ` Ilpo Järvinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240304205005.10078-3-W_Armin@gmx.de \
    --to=w_armin@gmx.de \
    --cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®