From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 347D0136995; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 16:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709744088; cv=none; b=rfEwqX4WZh6p7zIWbujtTW/kxqrFYiaXAsHVELZN+J5uP2jD7GHYakcEhXrZB7CwyZu9y2pcd5PHBLZtpOxt13m25sl2OZIrREoQ8WADE6uq/taF5k4daM1vlH1VU1rXj16VEaj7u4iGXuWcl3s0yOEh/l4IoVVxaVzajkuAsE8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709744088; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SzoK0Fw3umtF2LI2/KfCcWVLApBj6ZybhrvyoFVg85U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dyOfHr5ElAT6ZsFeAK7m0xpMIqrbOM5/5ZVZAP0Q/7iRixwIh6zwXdNI/NBaSjwBdmUA/Z01C1bDZPHaSaS5xEAuKaPrQX+WJD2jvCqa3S3G60pP0lq/Td9mRJqiUKIWFVsadcuLiw3H3dPx/pwsJQlPclXz12OjWqx9wzTUWMU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=SRCOD/GS; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=kEIbJrkA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="SRCOD/GS"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="kEIbJrkA" Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 17:54:43 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1709744085; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SzoK0Fw3umtF2LI2/KfCcWVLApBj6ZybhrvyoFVg85U=; b=SRCOD/GSPjz1VFqxmztRkD9kmTvj+FnLQCGN3dmW8kMCM6rBAk3GzTl24Df+/vNGfTNWIF GIJuTdPYx4x5E5YYDAABtR06jRvShl5HmSMfMzslmf45pe68gsL6daIahK1Yfs2L+q6d+H xHBfc5ubfHsK1Ln7jQrFIL/1vDfP2iu5Gy2G7XhqxwIUaOgygGegosJEHBPhzsbtpWayue wLK0LIhgYKImMC3e3lf4/mxhkXszBPJvm4BH5HOduu/5sOFzm18rSGE2hr78Sw9A7sGjiF FEOfvMXOQz+ReBenspsds+G+pQ8exMFII8gW4fbxdIASzcgJJivCbKluydZr3A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1709744085; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SzoK0Fw3umtF2LI2/KfCcWVLApBj6ZybhrvyoFVg85U=; b=kEIbJrkA4wW+QV7jKi44QsxBEyvS69z5PNbN23yP6TIApcmpoYG9VcEAw4poCS+02pemoW N89T/yyh6pNDfxCA== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Mike Galbraith , Peter Zijlstra , Marco Elver , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Juri Lelli , Clark Williams , Alessandro Carminati , Thomas Gleixner , Artem Savkov Subject: Re: 'perf test sigtrap' failing on PREEMPT_RT_FULL Message-ID: <20240306165443.5AKJ403t@linutronix.de> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: On 2024-03-06 13:27:06 [-0300], Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > That its what introduces perf_pending_task(), I'm now unsure we can just > disable migration, as event_sched_out() seems to require being called > under a raw_spin_lock and that disables preemption... Not sure what the best course of action is here but based on what I learned last time you reported this I think we need delayed signals=E2=80=A6 Let me look into this. We had it and then removed it because we had no users of it at some point but probably nobody took perf into account. > - Arnaldo Sebastian