From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCDD740861; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709920752; cv=none; b=usmVDfjYSIaZkT2Nf3+ofnV486rmG/0HJEAOXUsv+/YlzYl+QJLH3OHOhyl0is3iUY4TW0VWw12NG+hxtZb7l7hV2/oVfpOClhJtMWfs1e8cze38vNJeJaGxTRRcag4Axfl9cWFUtYzLMvqVrlHUGUBBnd9RleL6dDTqCzTS9Tk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709920752; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v9TVEwaCU3ggziH+Z09sETdzhB/jIVSJH7mxb1N2tlc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Tqn3YWB7odf93LnU0IsxbFMBRRlKZ+rn4iDrQdFfJtMOKOcl47YK+NNiiXE2nzOhH31fCYHTmEpJ8xJTJdkmpAF8e8RNMrKbbbWYw3I8Gp0aeqdsUtCHE0iAtUWcblz6oUJ6v1pLJ6/GZqyASqRXfsHOnHboZOsJLDrv9NxSA/k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=uYVPMkco; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=kgJrC8C8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="uYVPMkco"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="kgJrC8C8" Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:59:07 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1709920749; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v9TVEwaCU3ggziH+Z09sETdzhB/jIVSJH7mxb1N2tlc=; b=uYVPMkco1a/d/xnyB59EiVy7KjV5lYesQqdxZVaA0xTHP1mX7bsPEyV3TBKV/E1R6nH0cw mAgASTLx4MOirhWlVXQ+VVjdxUsqU6X+ze/lCa829LXdKMwrsYX61I6ozF2N/IlGmwKwF8 VdMWJLgNP3jLaotDaM4UJPyDJe60ED4xvUy8n1rYzNiSg+ZuiAKWAXkj7+cZj7hflh2ga3 1itlh6HebgMMHUHJ3SRkU0gMF56iKYzp/D81Jy2f4S6BUcf/upF+3+OMS2tqK3wKVYQrLV mv88ivLGAXaTj17TijMLBcCPdsoLXLRG8TSzgAjJ/AIEmSU9MX2C1ZaFFdv2xw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1709920749; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v9TVEwaCU3ggziH+Z09sETdzhB/jIVSJH7mxb1N2tlc=; b=kgJrC8C8rz7FUVeCewk24+rB5Gec0JHU2EjgBQiGTHLOAsMvoEVhc1os8tkGVetnwa6G2x BflBJ5NYkm4QOBBA== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Mike Galbraith , Peter Zijlstra , Marco Elver , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Juri Lelli , Clark Williams , Alessandro Carminati , Thomas Gleixner , Artem Savkov Subject: Re: 'perf test sigtrap' failing on PREEMPT_RT_FULL Message-ID: <20240308175907.Stc5UU3y@linutronix.de> References: <20240306165443.5AKJ403t@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20240306165443.5AKJ403t@linutronix.de> On 2024-03-06 17:54:45 [+0100], To Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Not sure what the best course of action is here but based on what I > learned last time you reported this I think we need delayed signals=E2=80= =A6 > Let me look into this. We had it and then removed it because we had no > users of it at some point but probably nobody took perf into account. =3D> https://lore.kernel.org/20240308175810.2894694-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de > - Arnaldo Sebastian