[PATCH v2] sched/fair: fix initial util_avg calculation

[Dawei Li <daweilics@gmail.com>]

Change se->load.weight to se_weight(se) in the calculation for the
initial util_avg to avoid unnecessarily inflating the util_avg by 1024
times.

The reason is that se->load.weight has the unit/scale as the scaled-up
load, while cfs_rg->avg.load_avg has the unit/scale as the true task
weight (as mapped directly from the task's nice/priority value). With
CONFIG_32BIT, the scaled-up load is equal to the true task weight. With
CONFIG_64BIT, the scaled-up load is 1024 times the true task weight.
Thus, the current code may inflate the util_avg by 1024 times. The
follow-up capping will not allow the util_avg value to go wild. But the
calculation should have the correct logic.

Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <daweilics@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- update the commit message
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a19ea290b790..5f98f639bdb9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1031,7 +1031,8 @@ void init_entity_runnable_average(struct sched_entity *se)
  * With new tasks being created, their initial util_avgs are extrapolated
  * based on the cfs_rq's current util_avg:
  *
- *   util_avg = cfs_rq->util_avg / (cfs_rq->load_avg + 1) * se.load.weight
+ *   util_avg = cfs_rq->avg.util_avg / (cfs_rq->avg.load_avg + 1)
+ *		* se_weight(se)
  *
  * However, in many cases, the above util_avg does not give a desired
  * value. Moreover, the sum of the util_avgs may be divergent, such
@@ -1078,7 +1079,7 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct task_struct *p)
 
 	if (cap > 0) {
 		if (cfs_rq->avg.util_avg != 0) {
-			sa->util_avg  = cfs_rq->avg.util_avg * se->load.weight;
+			sa->util_avg  = cfs_rq->avg.util_avg * se_weight(se);
 			sa->util_avg /= (cfs_rq->avg.load_avg + 1);
 
 			if (sa->util_avg > cap)
-- 
2.40.1