From: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <mchauras@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <mchauras@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/doc: Update documentation for base_slice_ns and CONFIG_HZ relation
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 23:08:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240320173815.927637-2-mchauras@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
The tunable base_slice_ns is dependent on CONFIG_HZ (i.e. TICK_NSEC)
for any significant performance improvement. The reason being the
scheduler tick is not frequent enough to force preemption when
base_slice expires in case of
base_slice_ns < TICK_NSEC
The below data is of stress-ng
Number of CPU: 1
Stressor threads: 4
Time: 30sec
On CONFIG_HZ=1000
| base_slice | avg-run (msec) | context-switches |
| ---------- | -------------- | ---------------- |
| 3ms | 2.914 | 10342 |
| 6ms | 4.857 | 6196 |
| 9ms | 6.754 | 4482 |
| 12ms | 7.872 | 3802 |
| 22ms | 11.294 | 2710 |
| 32ms | 13.425 | 2284 |
On CONFIG_HZ=100
| base_slice | avg-run (msec) | context-switches |
| ---------- | -------------- | ---------------- |
| 3ms | 9.144 | 3337 |
| 6ms | 9.113 | 3301 |
| 9ms | 8.991 | 3315 |
| 12ms | 12.935 | 2328 |
| 22ms | 16.031 | 1915 |
| 32ms | 18.608 | 1622 |
base_slice: the value of base_slice in ms
avg-run (msec): average time of the stressor threads got on cpu before
it got preempted
context-switches: number of context switches for the stress-ng process
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <mchauras@linux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst
index 6cffffe26500..82985d675554 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst
@@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ which can be used to tune the scheduler from "desktop" (i.e., low latencies) to
"server" (i.e., good batching) workloads. It defaults to a setting suitable
for desktop workloads. SCHED_BATCH is handled by the CFS scheduler module too.
+In case the CONFIG_HZ leads to base_slice_ns < TICK_NSEC. The settings of
+base_slice_ns will have little to no impact on the workloads.
+
Due to its design, the CFS scheduler is not prone to any of the "attacks" that
exist today against the heuristics of the stock scheduler: fiftyp.c, thud.c,
chew.c, ring-test.c, massive_intr.c all work fine and do not impact
--
2.44.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-20 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-20 17:38 Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya [this message]
2024-03-21 14:55 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-03-21 19:45 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240320173815.927637-2-mchauras@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mchauras@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®