From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E97E7523A; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 07:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711177316; cv=none; b=glbZ3XNvUtSTqllZo9o+/4F0yDlGJPQlK79VKwgJ5tkOwo+tOWGfuNFV7qQM+RDOJEA4tmGvAKqkjYDss3HTwOYozYMWKLR8IPIpRHabWZiB6Wlidp+OrubPXIgEwxcyHITYNWRhhOnTMLSAjaDdIA9QtEa8JyJWfxxncMINemQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711177316; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yhbjA5niZQhSFgh07i14d0fXkDpexeMQw2/j5Wlv5v8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Pp34ybzUhF/V0jVvfDC6l/VRsEwcfuxjQikZ3494Hb9vVniIMSNf+uhiJwDE8tKTJ0VCKCjhRfBTPQo60qAuOgHJgCVI34EHZeQDDHaW9CdClRkOwGumvk/8S1lAflzHj8ZmJwMron9RuAoxAN08hYXDChMk2xvJeHSYsSA2I/M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ihJsGJVb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ihJsGJVb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711177315; x=1742713315; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=yhbjA5niZQhSFgh07i14d0fXkDpexeMQw2/j5Wlv5v8=; b=ihJsGJVb9TuAtV/twgKI5E5lM0mTJypxBbdkVFDmEwCf20p/SpPvqZba IAObMGn6Zec8IGjjzcEmAprYUH86G01YFn97xV04fXKjcaxM0B0wCPYQY vazMhhUYTclep1YtHt2dIGrKsrlFN0n91Q8a20HqMHLXxIGvxNdMlXd9X m60sB5YwCF0iWFFPnEkjeGCYAAIFVLYsh5u1QPUI8m6zS6dREvXqZCQ2X 3Lvv6Xk6d9+GhFaOpVktWYzfogWbVmscHUbMFs37RIa7Yp5rpz2p4SOXs FSCB4+RxH2wrP6y9hP6gcEiQHffa9RJo9CkZD3FmGlYAMdzkudzd69cIC w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11021"; a="10021885" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,148,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="10021885" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Mar 2024 00:01:54 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,148,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="19815686" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2024 00:01:50 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rnvO0-000KwJ-06; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 07:01:48 +0000 Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:01:40 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Alex Bee , Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Linus Walleij , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Chris Zhong , Zhang Qing , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Alex Bee Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mfd: rk8xx: Add RK816 support Message-ID: <202403231417.oV6q6CGc-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240321143911.90210-5-knaerzche@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240321143911.90210-5-knaerzche@gmail.com> Hi Alex, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on lee-mfd/for-mfd-next] [also build test WARNING on lee-mfd/for-mfd-fixes broonie-regulator/for-next robh/for-next linus/master v6.8 next-20240322] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alex-Bee/dt-bindings-mfd-Add-rk816-binding/20240321-224318 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git for-mfd-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240321143911.90210-5-knaerzche%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/5] mfd: rk8xx: Add RK816 support config: arc-randconfig-001-20240322 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240323/202403231417.oV6q6CGc-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240323/202403231417.oV6q6CGc-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403231417.oV6q6CGc-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/mfd/rk8xx-core.c:395:8: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type [-Wignored-qualifiers] 395 | static const unsigned int rk816_get_irq_reg(struct regmap_irq_chip_data *data, | ^~~~~ vim +395 drivers/mfd/rk8xx-core.c 394 > 395 static const unsigned int rk816_get_irq_reg(struct regmap_irq_chip_data *data, 396 unsigned int base, int index) 397 { 398 unsigned int irq_reg = base; 399 400 switch (base) { 401 case RK816_INT_STS_REG1: 402 irq_reg += rk816_irq_status_offsets[index]; 403 break; 404 case RK816_INT_STS_MSK_REG1: 405 irq_reg += rk816_irq_mask_offsets[index]; 406 break; 407 } 408 409 return irq_reg; 410 }; 411 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki