From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: Switch over to MSI interrupts
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:19:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240325211915.GA1449994@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240312165905.1764507-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
[+bcc Mateusz]
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 06:59:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Some devices support MSI interrupts. Let's at least try to use them in
> platforms that provide MSI capability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
> index 8c00e0c695c5..c36a101df7be 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static int intel_lpss_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_LEGACY);
> + ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
I guess at least some of these devices do support INTx, since we
always used INTx previously, right?
There are a bunch of bug reports complaining about a lack of _PRT
entries for them, e.g., these from
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212261#c24:
intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: PCI INT A: not connected
intel-lpss: probe of 0000:00:15.0 failed with error -22
intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: can't derive routing for PCI INT C
intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: PCI INT C: not connected
intel-lpss: probe of 0000:00:15.2 failed with error -22
intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: PCI INT A: not connected
intel-lpss: probe of 0000:00:19.0 failed with error -22
intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: can't derive routing for PCI INT B
intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: PCI INT B: not connected
intel-lpss: probe of 0000:00:19.1 failed with error -22
intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.0: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.0: PCI INT A: not connected
intel-lpss: probe of 0000:00:1e.0 failed with error -22
intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.3: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.3: can't derive routing for PCI INT D
intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.3: PCI INT D: not connected
intel-lpss: probe of 0000:00:1e.3 failed with error -22
I don't know if these are a _PRT bug (I think if a device advertises a
non-zero Interrupt Pin, the _PRT should tell us how it is routed), or
possibly a device bug (advertises Interrupt Pin == INTA when it should
advertise "no INTx used"), or something else.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-25 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-12 16:59 Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-21 16:02 ` (subset) " Lee Jones
2024-03-25 21:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-03-26 10:06 ` Mateusz K
2024-03-26 14:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-26 14:50 ` Mateusz K
2024-03-26 15:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-26 15:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-27 13:17 ` Lee Jones
2024-03-27 13:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-27 14:12 ` Lee Jones
2024-03-27 14:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-26 16:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-26 21:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-03-26 21:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-26 22:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-03-26 22:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240325211915.GA1449994@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®