From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/percpu: Fix x86_this_cpu_variable_test_bit() asm template
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 11:42:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240404094218.448963-1-ubizjak@gmail.com> (raw)
Fix x86_this_cpu_variable_test_bit(), which is implemented with
wrong asm template, where argument 2 (count argument) is considered
as percpu variable. However, x86_this_cpu_test_bit() is currently
used exclusively with constant bit number argument, so the called
x86_this_cpu_variable_test_bit() function is never instantiated.
The fix introduces named assembler operands to prevent this kind
of errors.
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
---
v2: Split from the original v1 patch.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
index 20696df5d567..cbfbbe836ee2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
@@ -586,10 +586,11 @@ static inline bool x86_this_cpu_variable_test_bit(int nr,
{
bool oldbit;
- asm volatile("btl "__percpu_arg(2)",%1"
+ asm volatile("btl %[nr], " __percpu_arg([var])
CC_SET(c)
: CC_OUT(c) (oldbit)
- : "m" (*__my_cpu_ptr((unsigned long __percpu *)(addr))), "Ir" (nr));
+ : [var] "m" (*__my_cpu_ptr((unsigned long __percpu *)(addr))),
+ [nr] "Ir" (nr));
return oldbit;
}
--
2.44.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 9:42 Uros Bizjak [this message]
2024-04-04 9:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/percpu: Rewrite x86_this_cpu_test_bit() and friends as macros Uros Bizjak
2024-04-06 11:07 ` [tip: x86/percpu] " tip-bot2 for Uros Bizjak
2024-04-04 9:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/percpu: Introduce raw_cpu_read_long() to reduce ifdeffery Uros Bizjak
2024-04-06 11:07 ` [tip: x86/percpu] " tip-bot2 for Uros Bizjak
2024-04-06 11:07 ` [tip: x86/percpu] x86/percpu: Fix x86_this_cpu_variable_test_bit() asm template tip-bot2 for Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240404094218.448963-1-ubizjak@gmail.com \
--to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®