mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
To: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>
Cc: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC v3 2/7] net: ravb: Align poll function with NAPI docs
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:44:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240415114419.GG3156415@ragnatech.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240415094804.8016-3-paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>

Hi Paul,

Thanks for your work.

On 2024-04-15 10:47:59 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
> Call napi_complete_done() in accordance with the documentation in
> `Documentation/networking/napi.rst`.

The way I understand it napi_complete() is still OK to use, it's just a 
wrapper for napi_complete_done(napi, 0). But of course using 
napi_complete_done() is better if you want to use the busypolling status 
returned. Maybe the commit message can be updated to reflect this 
change, how about?

    net: ravb: Consider busypolling status when re-enabling interrupts

    Make use of the busypolling status returned from NAPI complete to decide 
    if interrupts shall be re-enabled or not. This is useful to reduce the 
    interrupt overhead.

    While at it switch to using napi_complete_done() as it take into account 
    the work done when providing the busypolling status.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 26 ++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index 33f8043143c1..1ac599a044b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -1340,23 +1340,19 @@ static int ravb_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>  	if (priv->rx_fifo_errors != ndev->stats.rx_fifo_errors)
>  		ndev->stats.rx_fifo_errors = priv->rx_fifo_errors;
>  
> -	if (work_done == budget)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	napi_complete(napi);
> -
> -	/* Re-enable RX/TX interrupts */
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> -	if (!info->irq_en_dis) {
> -		ravb_modify(ndev, RIC0, mask, mask);
> -		ravb_modify(ndev, TIC,  mask, mask);
> -	} else {
> -		ravb_write(ndev, mask, RIE0);
> -		ravb_write(ndev, mask, TIE);
> +	if (work_done < budget && napi_complete_done(napi, work_done)) {
> +		/* Re-enable RX/TX interrupts */
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> +		if (!info->irq_en_dis) {
> +			ravb_modify(ndev, RIC0, mask, mask);
> +			ravb_modify(ndev, TIC,  mask, mask);
> +		} else {
> +			ravb_write(ndev, mask, RIE0);
> +			ravb_write(ndev, mask, TIE);
> +		}
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>  
> -out:
>  	return work_done;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

-- 
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-15 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-15  9:47 [net-next RFC v3 0/7] Improve GbEth performance on Renesas RZ/G2L and related SoCs Paul Barker
2024-04-15  9:47 ` [net-next RFC v3 1/7] net: ravb: Simplify poll & receive functions Paul Barker
2024-04-15 11:23   ` Niklas Söderlund
2024-04-15 11:31     ` Paul Barker
2024-04-15  9:47 ` [net-next RFC v3 2/7] net: ravb: Align poll function with NAPI docs Paul Barker
2024-04-15 11:44   ` Niklas Söderlund [this message]
2024-04-15 12:08     ` Paul Barker
2024-04-15  9:48 ` [net-next RFC v3 3/7] net: ravb: Refactor RX ring refill Paul Barker
2024-04-15 11:57   ` Niklas Söderlund
2024-04-15 12:18     ` Paul Barker
2024-04-15 12:30       ` Niklas Söderlund
2024-04-15  9:48 ` [net-next RFC v3 4/7] net: ravb: Refactor GbEth RX code path Paul Barker
2024-04-19 20:03   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-04-21 15:49     ` Paul Barker
2024-04-21 20:23       ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-04-15  9:48 ` [net-next RFC v3 5/7] net: ravb: Enable SW IRQ Coalescing for GbEth Paul Barker
2024-04-19 20:26   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-04-15  9:48 ` [net-next RFC v3 6/7] net: ravb: Use NAPI threaded mode on 1-core CPUs with GbEth IP Paul Barker
2024-04-19 20:32   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-04-15  9:48 ` [net-next RFC v3 7/7] net: ravb: Allocate RX buffers via page pool Paul Barker
2024-04-15 12:16   ` Niklas Söderlund
2024-04-19  8:02     ` Paul Barker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240415114419.GG3156415@ragnatech.se \
    --to=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®