From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>, Adrian Reber <areber@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_set_tid.c appears to always pass?
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:09:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240418-hiebe-bahnt-066312cb324b@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240417152222.GA1517581@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 08:22:22AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> I am looking at tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_set_tid.c as part
> of a patch to clean up the uses of 'return ksft_exit_...();' throughout
> the selftests (as they call exit() so they do not return) and I noticed
> that it seems to always pass even when there may have been an error?
>
> if (waitpid(ns_pid, &status, 0) < 0) {
> ksft_print_msg("Child returned %s\n", strerror(errno));
> ret = -errno;
> goto out;
> }
>
> ...
> out:
> ret = 0;
>
> return !ret ? ksft_exit_pass() : ksft_exit_fail();
> }
>
> Should the ret and out label positions be switched? Alternatively, it
> seems like ret and out do not have that many uses, perhaps it would just
> be better to call the ksft_exit_...() directly in their respective
> paths? I am not going to touch it as part of my patch but I felt it was
> worth reporting since it appears to have been there since the
> introduction of this test in commit 41585bbeeef9 ("selftests: add tests
> for clone3() with *set_tid").
Uh, good point. Let me Cc the original author.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-18 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-17 15:22 Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-18 11:09 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240418-hiebe-bahnt-066312cb324b@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=areber@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®