From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A507380022 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713530148; cv=none; b=A136ZNudWsSiqEJa7z7eom9In32AKG86/UHgjeZm9vEQy48ig+pcIZX2wGpF86vsJtpfgaWU+T3BdTN584NAqh3R4y1zVFJfoP/WE904GdouZhSf8xMBy4z26cVVohtBuhIGZMHwaFAdxZgNarAJyTXv595pAa0+v4k0JO7HTRs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713530148; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GtxZQqgspqslmybbA9LI8ksFMPIvaK2pnMI+CrANGpM=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=okPoqwdC7EtcU+qURHEXKK8eWSLjbSUiFd3B5K5iE2/T0Eb4TMAYm22PzxZodh410Tu+LrtEghDkd8rP3jqDG73ZVsSSTK6XiKeqGqJMw17D5KrXlt/AM8TqwLl6CIU5TZwdfHYmVKZjKyOoH0S+kEWX7Jmq/XQSoU75nc9ZHdw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.48]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VLYvH4K5szdb00; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:32:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.21]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D821E18007B; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:35:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:35:38 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH -next v3 0/2] erofs: reliably distinguish block based and fscache mode Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:36:09 +0800 Message-ID: <20240419123611.947084-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) Hi Christian, As your original patch had some "DOS line endings", I failed at am it, so manually changed the relevant content when making v2, which caused Author to be modified, I just noticed this and corrected it, apologies for that. Changes since v2: Get rid of erofs_fs_context. Changes since v1: Allocate and initialise fc->s_fs_info in erofs_fc_get_tree() instead of modifying fc->sb_flags. V1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240415121746.1207242-1-libaokun1@huawei.com/ V2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417065513.3409744-1-libaokun1@huawei.com/ Baokun Li (1): erofs: get rid of erofs_fs_context Christian Brauner (1): erofs: reliably distinguish block based and fscache mode fs/erofs/internal.h | 7 --- fs/erofs/super.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) -- 2.31.1