From: <hupu@oppo.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<bsegall@google.com>, <mgorman@suse.de>, <bristot@redhat.com>,
<vschneid@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: hupu <hupu@oppo.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair.c: Fix the calculation method of 'lag' to ensure that the vlag of the task after placement is the same as before.
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:44:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240423114416.64308-1-hupu@oppo.com> (raw)
From: hupu <hupu@oppo.com>
I think the 'lag' calculation here is inaccurate.
Assume that delta needs to be subtracted from v_i to ensure that the
vlag of task i after placement is the same as before. At this time, the
vlag of task i after placement should be:
vl'_i = V' - (v_i - delta)
From the above formula, we know that vl'_i should be:
vl'_i = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)
That is to say:
V' - (v_i - delta) = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)
For a newly added entity, generally set v_i to V', and the above formula
can be converted into:
V' - (V' - delta) = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)
Therefore the value of delta should be as follows, where delta is the
'lag' in the code.
delta = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)
Signed-off-by: hupu <hupu@oppo.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 03be0d1330a6..c5f74f753be8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5239,9 +5239,12 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
if (curr && curr->on_rq)
load += scale_load_down(curr->load.weight);
- lag *= load + scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
+ lag *= load;
+
+ load += scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!load))
load = 1;
+
lag = div_s64(lag, load);
}
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-23 11:44 hupu [this message]
2024-04-24 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-25 11:44 ` [PATCH] sched/fair.c: Fix the calculation method of 'lag' hupu
2024-04-25 11:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240423114416.64308-1-hupu@oppo.com \
--to=hupu@oppo.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®