From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] KVM: x86: Refactor kvm_x86_ops.get_msr_feature() to avoid kvm_msr_entry
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:14:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240425181422.3250947-5-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240425181422.3250947-1-seanjc@google.com>
Refactor get_msr_feature() to take the index and data pointer as distinct
parameters in anticipation of eliminating "struct kvm_msr_entry" usage
further up the primary callchain.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 16 +++++++---------
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +++---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 1d13e3cd1dc5..7d56e5a52ae3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1785,7 +1785,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
int (*vm_move_enc_context_from)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int source_fd);
void (*guest_memory_reclaimed)(struct kvm *kvm);
- int (*get_msr_feature)(struct kvm_msr_entry *entry);
+ int (*get_msr_feature)(u32 msr, u64 *data);
int (*check_emulate_instruction)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int emul_type,
void *insn, int insn_len);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 6e518edbd2aa..15422b7d9149 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -2796,14 +2796,14 @@ static int efer_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return kvm_complete_insn_gp(vcpu, ret);
}
-static int svm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
+static int svm_get_msr_feature(u32 msr, u64 *data)
{
- msr->data = 0;
+ *data = 0;
- switch (msr->index) {
+ switch (msr) {
case MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG:
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC))
- msr->data |= MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG_LFENCE_SERIALIZE;
+ *data |= MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG_LFENCE_SERIALIZE;
break;
default:
return KVM_MSR_RET_UNSUPPORTED;
@@ -3132,14 +3132,12 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
kvm_pr_unimpl_wrmsr(vcpu, ecx, data);
break;
case MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG: {
- struct kvm_msr_entry msr_entry;
+ u64 supported_de_cfg;
- msr_entry.index = msr->index;
- if (svm_get_msr_feature(&msr_entry))
+ if (svm_get_msr_feature(ecx, &supported_de_cfg))
return 1;
- /* Check the supported bits */
- if (data & ~msr_entry.data)
+ if (data & ~supported_de_cfg)
return 1;
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 0ad2e7545de3..25b0a838abd6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1955,13 +1955,13 @@ static inline bool is_vmx_feature_control_msr_valid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
return !(msr->data & ~valid_bits);
}
-int vmx_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
+int vmx_get_msr_feature(u32 msr, u64 *data)
{
- switch (msr->index) {
+ switch (msr) {
case KVM_FIRST_EMULATED_VMX_MSR ... KVM_LAST_EMULATED_VMX_MSR:
if (!nested)
return 1;
- return vmx_get_vmx_msr(&vmcs_config.nested, msr->index, &msr->data);
+ return vmx_get_vmx_msr(&vmcs_config.nested, msr, data);
default:
return KVM_MSR_RET_UNSUPPORTED;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h
index 502704596c83..504d56d6837d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ bool vmx_has_emulated_msr(struct kvm *kvm, u32 index);
void vmx_msr_filter_changed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void vmx_prepare_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void vmx_update_exception_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-int vmx_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr);
+int vmx_get_msr_feature(u32 msr, u64 *data);
int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info);
u64 vmx_get_segment_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int seg);
void vmx_get_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_segment *var, int seg);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 2b07f0f11aeb..03e50812ab33 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1695,7 +1695,7 @@ static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
rdmsrl_safe(msr->index, &msr->data);
break;
default:
- return static_call(kvm_x86_get_msr_feature)(msr);
+ return static_call(kvm_x86_get_msr_feature)(msr->index, &msr->data);
}
return 0;
}
--
2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-25 18:14 [PATCH 00/10] KVM: x86: Clean up MSR access/failure handling Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 18:14 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Disallow guest from changing userspace's MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG value Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 18:14 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: x86: Move MSR_TYPE_{R,W,RW} values from VMX to x86, as enums Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 18:14 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: x86: Rename KVM_MSR_RET_INVALID to KVM_MSR_RET_UNSUPPORTED Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 18:14 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-04-25 18:14 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: x86: Rename get_msr_feature() APIs to get_feature_msr() Sean Christopherson
2024-04-26 6:58 ` Yang, Weijiang
2024-04-25 18:14 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: x86: Refactor kvm_get_feature_msr() to avoid struct kvm_msr_entry Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 18:14 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: x86: Funnel all fancy MSR return value handling into a common helper Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 18:14 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86: Hoist x86.c's global msr_* variables up above kvm_do_msr_access() Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 18:14 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: x86: Suppress failures on userspace access to advertised, unsupported MSRs Sean Christopherson
2024-04-26 12:36 ` Yang, Weijiang
2024-04-26 17:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 18:14 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: x86: Suppress userspace access failures on unsupported, "emulated" MSRs Sean Christopherson
2024-04-26 7:43 ` Yang, Weijiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240425181422.3250947-5-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®