From: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@redhat.com>
To: krzk@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org
Cc: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syoshida@redhat.com,
syzbot+d7b4dc6cd50410152534@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH net v3] nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_rx_work
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 17:22:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240502082323.250739-1-ryasuoka@redhat.com> (raw)
syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1]
nci_rx_work() parses received packet from ndev->rx_q. It should be
validated header size, payload size and total packet size before
processing the packet. If an invalid packet is detected, it should be
silently discarded.
Fixes: d24b03535e5e ("nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+d7b4dc6cd50410152534@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d7b4dc6cd50410152534 [1]
Signed-off-by: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@redhat.com>
---
v3
- As Simon pointed out, the valid packets will reach invalid_pkt_free
and kfree_skb(skb) after being handled correctly in switch statement.
It can lead to double free issues, which is not intended. So this patch
uses "continue" instead of "break" in switch statement.
- In the current implementation, once zero payload size is detected, the
for statement exits. It should continue processing subsequent packets.
So this patch just frees skb in invalid_pkt_free when the invalid
packets are detected.
v2
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240428134525.GW516117@kernel.org/T/
- The v1 patch only checked whether skb->len is zero. This patch also
checks header size, payload size and total packet size.
v1
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/CANn89iJrQevxPFLCj2P=U+XSisYD0jqrUQpa=zWMXTjj5+RriA@mail.gmail.com/T/
net/nfc/nci/core.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/core.c b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
index 0d26c8ec9993..e4f92a090022 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
@@ -1463,6 +1463,16 @@ int nci_core_ntf_packet(struct nci_dev *ndev, __u16 opcode,
ndev->ops->n_core_ops);
}
+static bool nci_valid_size(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int header_size)
+{
+ if (skb->len < header_size ||
+ !nci_plen(skb->data) ||
+ skb->len < header_size + nci_plen(skb->data)) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
/* ---- NCI TX Data worker thread ---- */
static void nci_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -1516,30 +1526,35 @@ static void nci_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
nfc_send_to_raw_sock(ndev->nfc_dev, skb,
RAW_PAYLOAD_NCI, NFC_DIRECTION_RX);
- if (!nci_plen(skb->data)) {
- kfree_skb(skb);
- break;
- }
+ if (!skb->len)
+ goto invalid_pkt_free;
/* Process frame */
switch (nci_mt(skb->data)) {
case NCI_MT_RSP_PKT:
+ if (!nci_valid_size(skb, NCI_CTRL_HDR_SIZE))
+ goto invalid_pkt_free;
nci_rsp_packet(ndev, skb);
- break;
+ continue;
case NCI_MT_NTF_PKT:
+ if (!nci_valid_size(skb, NCI_CTRL_HDR_SIZE))
+ goto invalid_pkt_free;
nci_ntf_packet(ndev, skb);
- break;
+ continue;
case NCI_MT_DATA_PKT:
+ if (!nci_valid_size(skb, NCI_DATA_HDR_SIZE))
+ goto invalid_pkt_free;
nci_rx_data_packet(ndev, skb);
- break;
+ continue;
default:
pr_err("unknown MT 0x%x\n", nci_mt(skb->data));
- kfree_skb(skb);
- break;
+ goto invalid_pkt_free;
}
+invalid_pkt_free:
+ kfree_skb(skb);
}
/* check if a data exchange timeout has occurred */
--
2.44.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-05-02 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-02 8:22 Ryosuke Yasuoka [this message]
2024-05-03 9:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-05-04 16:33 ` Ryosuke Yasuoka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240502082323.250739-1-ryasuoka@redhat.com \
--to=ryasuoka@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syoshida@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+d7b4dc6cd50410152534@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®